Appellant / Complainant
Sanjeev Jain
Respondent
Aadhar Infraholding Ltd.
aadhar infraholding ltd.
₹9,28,728
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000332019 by Sanjeev Jain against Aadhar Infraholding Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed five appeals against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of complaints, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, neither the original complaints nor the subsequent appeals were maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties despite prior notice and reserved the judgment to be decided based on the available pleadings and documents.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to medical reasons and scheduled the matter for an ex parte hearing on 23.11.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and scheduled an ex-parte hearing for October 18, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for hearing on 20.09.2022, referencing a previous order passed in a related matter.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal or face ex-parte proceedings and ordered both parties to exchange concise written arguments before the next hearing on 29.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon case law and scheduled the matter for hearing on 20.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for final hearing on 19.04.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 28.01.2022 because the appellant's counsel met with an accident and is currently bedridden.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal decided to proceed with an ex-parte hearing against the respondent due to their failure to appear or file objections, and adjourned the matter to 07.01.2022 for the appellant's arguments.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a conflict in the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for 14.12.2021.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for December 9, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated failure to comply with previous orders and non-appearance, directing the matter to be heard based on available records.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the appeal before the next hearing and scheduled the matter for 27.10.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 15 days to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and permitted the appellant to file a rejoinder thereafter.
Tribunal Order #0901126000332019-29-05-2023
The Tribunal dismissed five appeals against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of complaints, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, neither the original complaints nor the subsequent appeals were maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Tribunal Order #0901126000332019-14-12-2021
The Tribunal decided to proceed with an ex-parte hearing against the respondent due to their failure to appear or file objections, and adjourned the matter to 07.01.2022 for the appellant's arguments.
Tribunal Order #0901126000332019-27-10-2021
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated failure to comply with previous orders and non-appearance, directing the matter to be heard based on available records.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed five appeals against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of complaints, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, neither the original complaints nor the subsequent appeals were maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed five appeals against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of complaints, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, neither the original complaints nor the subsequent appeals were maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Prabhat Kumar Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vikas Verma
- Romit Seth
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal dismissed five appeals against the Regulatory Authority's rejection of complaints, ruling that because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, neither the original complaints nor the subsequent appeals were maintainable under the precedent set in M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
The Tribunal decided to proceed with an ex-parte hearing against the respondent due to their failure to appear or file objections, and adjourned the matter to 07.01.2022 for the appellant's arguments.
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to repeated failure to comply with previous orders and non-appearance, directing the matter to be heard based on available records.
Need to research all rulings for aadhar infraholding ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.