Appellant / Complainant
Laureate Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Sangeeta Kumar, Sunil Mahajan
laureate buildwell pvt. ltd.
₹47,86,035
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001002020 by Laureate Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. against Sangeeta Kumar, Sunil Mahajan before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the authority erred by directing possession or refund without first setting aside the valid cancellation of the allotment due to the respondents' payment defaults.
Hearing
The appellant is challenging a RERA order that directed the developer to provide the allotted unit at the original booking rate or refund the amount with interest, arguing that RERA failed to consider the prior lawful cancellation of the allotment due to non-payment.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent two days to prepare a brief regarding the validity of the Regulatory Authority's order and adjourned the matter to 26.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal fixed the next hearing date for Appeal-142/2020 to 19.02.2024 and directed that no further adjournments will be granted on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 17.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 11.09.2023 due to the counsel for the appellant being on leave, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal reasons and scheduled the next hearing for 21.08.2023, with a warning that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The court granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 18.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to ensure compliance with a previous order dated 11.04.2023 and rescheduled the hearing for 24.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to produce evidence regarding the forfeiture of the respondent's funds, including the specific letter notifying the respondent of such forfeiture and the original allotment records, by the next hearing date.
Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned due to the absence of the respondent's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 11.04.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the matter for a final hearing on 02.03.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and scheduled the next hearing for January 31, 2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the hearing for 22.12.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the counsels of both parties to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 25.11.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing of Appeal-142/2020 to 23.11.2022 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on 18.10.2022.
Further Hearing
This document is a formal header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-142/2020) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, containing party details and presiding members, but does not contain any substantive rulings or directives.
Further Hearing
The matter was adjourned to 23.09.2022 due to the absence of the appellant's counsel.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel 24 hours to prepare arguments regarding a change of prayer in the written complaint and adjourned the matter to 22.09.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.09.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to reschedule the appeal for further hearing to 28.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The order indicates that the case list has been revised for the hearing of Appeal-142/2020 before the Division Bench.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the appeal for a final hearing on 22.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to lack of time and scheduled the next hearing for July 18, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to lack of time and ordered the case to be listed for further hearing on 15.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The matter was adjourned due to lack of time, with the court scheduling the next hearing for 14.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for a hearing on 12.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 25.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a list of dates, events, and relied-upon cases at least seven days before the next hearing. The case is scheduled for final hearing on 23.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon cases before the next hearing, which is scheduled for 19.04.2022.
Arguments
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by both parties due to lack of preparation and directed the counsels to exchange lists of cited cases before the next hearing on January 17, 2022.
Arguments
The Tribunal directed the parties to submit and exchange a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and adjourned the matter to 13.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments at least three days before the next hearing, and scheduled the appeal for arguments on 18.11.2021.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so will result in an order being passed according to law.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to ensure compliance with the order dated 15.02.2021 and scheduled the next hearing for 16.03.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify any deficiency in the deposit required under Section 43(5) of the Act and to file a Chartered Accountant's certificate clarifying compliance with the Regulatory Authority's order.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a short adjournment to file a reply regarding the respondent's objection to the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act, listing the matter for hearing on 15.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001002020-16-03-2021
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so will result in an order being passed according to law.
Tribunal Order #0901126001002020-15-02-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify any deficiency in the deposit required under Section 43(5) of the Act and to file a Chartered Accountant's certificate clarifying compliance with the Regulatory Authority's order.
Tribunal Order #0901126001002020-07-05-2024
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the authority erred by directing possession or refund without first setting aside the valid cancellation of the allotment due to the respondents' payment defaults.
Tribunal Order #0901126001002020-26-02-2024
The appellant is challenging a RERA order that directed the developer to provide the allotted unit at the original booking rate or refund the amount with interest, arguing that RERA failed to consider the prior lawful cancellation of the allotment due to non-payment.
Tribunal Order #0901126001002020-11-04-2023
The Tribunal directed the appellant to produce evidence regarding the forfeiture of the respondent's funds, including the specific letter notifying the respondent of such forfeiture and the original allotment records, by the next hearing date.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the authority erred by directing possession or refund without first setting aside the valid cancellation of the allotment due to the respondents' payment defaults. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the authority erred by directing possession or refund without first setting aside the valid cancellation of the allotment due to the respondents' payment defaults.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from the date of deposit till actual payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to do so will result in an order being passed according to law.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify any deficiency in the deposit required under Section 43(5) of the Act and to file a Chartered Accountant's certificate clarifying compliance with the Regulatory Authority's order.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the authority erred by directing possession or refund without first setting aside the valid cancellation of the allotment due to the respondents' payment defaults.
The appellant is challenging a RERA order that directed the developer to provide the allotted unit at the original booking rate or refund the amount with interest, arguing that RERA failed to consider the prior lawful cancellation of the allotment due to non-payment.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to produce evidence regarding the forfeiture of the respondent's funds, including the specific letter notifying the respondent of such forfeiture and the original allotment records, by the next hearing date.
Need to research all rulings for laureate buildwell pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.