Appellant / Complainant
Shruti
Respondent
Mr Proview Realtech Private Limited
mr proview realtech private limited
₹1,00,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002092022 by Shruti against Mr Proview Realtech Private Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the subsequent allottees' rights and possession timelines are governed by the fresh allotment agreement dated 07.05.2014 rather than the original agreement, thereby confirming the validity of the UPRERA rectification order.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the appeal, but has reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders or hearing on March 3, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the parties time to prepare their briefs for final arguments and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on February 6, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file objections to the computation chart submitted by the respondent and scheduled the next hearing for January 16, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal recorded the parties' submissions regarding payments made and outstanding dues for Flat No. D-206 and adjourned the matter to 10-12-2024 upon joint request.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with a previous order and granted an adjournment requested by the respondent, scheduling the matter for hearing/orders on 24.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an application with the Registry to delete previously uploaded annexures so that new ones can be uploaded in compliance with a prior order.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file necessary annexures to the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on August 8, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal denied permission for Sri Sunil Kumar to argue the case as he was not listed as an appellant and adjourned the proceedings to 11.07.2024 following a request from the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant to allow them time to engage legal counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 14.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to re-upload all documents with proper descriptions and page numbers, and to coordinate with the Registry to delete undocumented annexures within one week.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal hearing for March 12, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel to prepare the brief and upload annexures, rescheduling the hearing for May 1, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to rectify and upload descriptions, dates, and page numbers for all filed annexures. The matter is scheduled for orders on 10.04.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel one week to file a Vakalatnama and adjourned the matter to 24.03.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
This is a procedural entry recording the commencement of the hearing for Appeal-74/2022 before the Division Bench, noting the presence of the parties and counsel.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 14.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the case for hearing on 12.09.2022 and directed the appellant's counsel to send the appeal via email.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the counsel to register on the e-portal for future cause list inclusion, scheduling the next hearing for 11.08.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal permitted the appellant's husband to appear as a co-applicant and directed the respondent to file a reply within two weeks, with subsequent timelines set for replication and electronic filing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 130-day delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation, registered the defective appeal as a Regular Appeal, and permitted co-allottee Mr. Suneel Kumar to attend future proceedings.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 08.04.2022 and directed the applicant to file an affidavit of service regarding notice sent to the respondent.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects and issued notice to the respondent regarding an appeal that appears to have been filed beyond the limitation period.
Tribunal Order #0901126002092022-08-04-2022
The Tribunal condoned a 130-day delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation, registered the defective appeal as a Regular Appeal, and permitted co-allottee Mr. Suneel Kumar to attend future proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126002092022-09-07-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the subsequent allottees' rights and possession timelines are governed by the fresh allotment agreement dated 07.05.2014 rather than the original agreement, thereby confirming the validity of the UPRERA rectification order.
Tribunal Order #0901126002092022-12-03-2024
The Tribunal directed the appellant to re-upload all documents with proper descriptions and page numbers, and to coordinate with the Registry to delete undocumented annexures within one week.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the subsequent allottees' rights and possession timelines are governed by the fresh allotment agreement dated 07.05.2014 rather than the original agreement, thereby confirming the validity of the UPRERA rectification order. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the subsequent allottees' rights and possession timelines are governed by the fresh allotment agreement dated 07.05.2014 rather than the original agreement, thereby confirming the validity of the UPRERA rectification order.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% per annum
Interest Period
w.e.f 07.11.2017 till obtaining of OC/CC by the promoter or till date of offer of possession, whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Applicant/Appellant In-Person
- Santosh Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal condoned a 130-day delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation, registered the defective appeal as a Regular Appeal, and permitted co-allottee Mr. Suneel Kumar to attend future proceedings.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the subsequent allottees' rights and possession timelines are governed by the fresh allotment agreement dated 07.05.2014 rather than the original agreement, thereby confirming the validity of the UPRERA rectification order.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to re-upload all documents with proper descriptions and page numbers, and to coordinate with the Registry to delete undocumented annexures within one week.
Need to research all rulings for mr proview realtech private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.