Appellant / Complainant
Shruti Mittal, Amit Mittal
Respondent
Upptal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
upptal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
₹5,79,570
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002702019 by Shruti Mittal, Amit Mittal against Upptal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's non-speaking order and remanded the matter back to RERA for a fresh decision, ruling that the developer failed to provide promised amenities despite collecting various charges.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding an appeal against a RERA order, specifically questioning the respondent about project amenities such as roads and drainage, before reserving judgment.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 21.10.2021 due to the respondent's repeated non-appearance and issued a warning that the case may be heard ex-parte on the next date.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a show cause notice to the respondent's counsel for repeated non-appearance, warning that failure to explain may result in a referral to the U.P. Bar Council for professional misconduct.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.03.2021 for final hearing due to the absence of the respondent's counsel.
For Order
The appeal is adjourned due to a call for lawyers to abstain from work by the Oudh Bar Association, with the matter rescheduled for 08.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to injury and rescheduled the hearing for 24.02.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel three days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 11.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126002702019-15-03-2022
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's non-speaking order and remanded the matter back to RERA for a fresh decision, ruling that the developer failed to provide promised amenities despite collecting various charges.
Tribunal Order #0901126002702019-21-10-2021
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding an appeal against a RERA order, specifically questioning the respondent about project amenities such as roads and drainage, before reserving judgment.
Tribunal Order #0901126002702019-18-03-2021
The Tribunal issued a show cause notice to the respondent's counsel for repeated non-appearance, warning that failure to explain may result in a referral to the U.P. Bar Council for professional misconduct.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's non-speaking order and remanded the matter back to RERA for a fresh decision, ruling that the developer failed to provide promised amenities despite collecting various charges. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: 18%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's non-speaking order and remanded the matter back to RERA for a fresh decision, ruling that the developer failed to provide promised amenities despite collecting various charges.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
18%
Interest Period
from the date of payment till entire facilities described above is provided
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Bal Kishor Verma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's non-speaking order and remanded the matter back to RERA for a fresh decision, ruling that the developer failed to provide promised amenities despite collecting various charges.
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding an appeal against a RERA order, specifically questioning the respondent about project amenities such as roads and drainage, before reserving judgment.
The Tribunal issued a show cause notice to the respondent's counsel for repeated non-appearance, warning that failure to explain may result in a referral to the U.P. Bar Council for professional misconduct.
Need to research all rulings for upptal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.