Appellant / Complainant
Krasa International Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Sakshi Bhagia
krasa international pvt. ltd.
₹21,22,242
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003112019 by Krasa International Pvt. Ltd. against Sakshi Bhagia before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Nominated Officer's order for refund, ruling that the complaint was premature as the possession deadline under the 2016 MOU had not yet expired and noting that the respondent failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Appellant submitted proof of deposit amounting to Rs. 30,76,321 plus costs for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and the matter is listed for further orders on 22.11.2021 following potential objections from the Respondent.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, subject to a penalty of Rs. 10,000 to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to achieve complete compliance by the next hearing on 05.10.2021 will result in the dismissal of the case.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal records the deposit of Rs. 10,00,000/- plus costs of Rs. 8,000/- by the Appellant in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directs the Registry to submit a compliance report.
For Order
The case is adjourned because lawyers are abstaining from work due to a call given by the Oudh Bar Association.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with Section 43(5) provisions and unpaid costs of Rs. 8,000, warning that the matter may be dismissed for non-compliance if requirements are not met by the next hearing on 02.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required amount, imposing a cost of Rs. 8,000 for the delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-14-12-2021
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Nominated Officer's order for refund, ruling that the complaint was premature as the possession deadline under the 2016 MOU had not yet expired and noting that the respondent failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-25-10-2021
The Appellant submitted proof of deposit amounting to Rs. 30,76,321 plus costs for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and the matter is listed for further orders on 22.11.2021 following potential objections from the Respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-05-10-2021
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, subject to a penalty of Rs. 10,000 to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-27-09-2021
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to achieve complete compliance by the next hearing on 05.10.2021 will result in the dismissal of the case.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-23-03-2021
The Tribunal records the deposit of Rs. 10,00,000/- plus costs of Rs. 8,000/- by the Appellant in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directs the Registry to submit a compliance report.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-18-02-2021
The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with Section 43(5) provisions and unpaid costs of Rs. 8,000, warning that the matter may be dismissed for non-compliance if requirements are not met by the next hearing on 02.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126003112019-04-02-2021
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required amount, imposing a cost of Rs. 8,000 for the delay.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Nominated Officer's order for refund, ruling that the complaint was premature as the possession deadline under the 2016 MOU had not yet expired and noting that the respondent failed to approach the authority with clean hands. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Nominated Officer's order for refund, ruling that the complaint was premature as the possession deadline under the 2016 MOU had not yet expired and noting that the respondent failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Azhar Ikram
- Manish Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Yash Tandon
- Tushar Bahadur
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (7)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Nominated Officer's order for refund, ruling that the complaint was premature as the possession deadline under the 2016 MOU had not yet expired and noting that the respondent failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
The Appellant submitted proof of deposit amounting to Rs. 30,76,321 plus costs for compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and the matter is listed for further orders on 22.11.2021 following potential objections from the Respondent.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, subject to a penalty of Rs. 10,000 to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, warning that failure to achieve complete compliance by the next hearing on 05.10.2021 will result in the dismissal of the case.
The Tribunal records the deposit of Rs. 10,00,000/- plus costs of Rs. 8,000/- by the Appellant in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and directs the Registry to submit a compliance report.
The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with Section 43(5) provisions and unpaid costs of Rs. 8,000, warning that the matter may be dismissed for non-compliance if requirements are not met by the next hearing on 02.03.2021.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required amount, imposing a cost of Rs. 8,000 for the delay.
Need to research all rulings for krasa international pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.