Appellant / Complainant
Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd, Gardenia Aims Developers Ltd.
Respondent
Arun Kumar Sahni, Anr.
gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003162019 by Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd, Gardenia Aims Developers Ltd. against Arun Kumar Sahni, Anr. before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the transfer of the promoter's partial pre-deposit to the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (U.P. RERA) to be distributed to the respondent during execution proceedings following the dismissal of the promoter's appeal.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant/promoter three days to seek instructions regarding an application for the release of funds deposited under Section 43(5) and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case to November 20, 2021, and directed the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding the deposit of required amounts before the final hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 15.11.2021 because the applicant was absent during the hearing.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
No text available.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit the balance amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing, noting that the previous deposit was insufficient.
Tribunal Order #0901126003162019-05-05-2022
The Tribunal directed the transfer of the promoter's partial pre-deposit to the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (U.P. RERA) to be distributed to the respondent during execution proceedings following the dismissal of the promoter's appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126003162019-28-01-2021
The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit the balance amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing, noting that the previous deposit was insufficient.
Tribunal Order #0901126003162019-20-11-2021
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126003162019-15-11-2021
The Tribunal adjourned the case to November 20, 2021, and directed the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding the deposit of required amounts before the final hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal directed the transfer of the promoter's partial pre-deposit to the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (U.P. RERA) to be distributed to the respondent during execution proceedings following the dismissal of the promoter's appeal. The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal directed the transfer of the promoter's partial pre-deposit to the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (U.P. RERA) to be distributed to the respondent during execution proceedings following the dismissal of the promoter's appeal. The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Suchita Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vishal Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal directed the transfer of the promoter's partial pre-deposit to the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (U.P. RERA) to be distributed to the respondent during execution proceedings following the dismissal of the promoter's appeal.
The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit the balance amount required under Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing, noting that the previous deposit was insufficient.
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
The Tribunal adjourned the case to November 20, 2021, and directed the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding the deposit of required amounts before the final hearing.
Need to research all rulings for gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.