Appellant / Complainant
Amit Agarwal, Bharti Agarwal
Respondent
Sunworld Residency Private Limited
sunworld residency private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003512021 by Amit Agarwal, Bharti Agarwal against Sunworld Residency Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn following a submission by the appellant's counsel that the dispute between Amit Agarwal and M/S Sunworld Residency Private Limited has been settled amicably.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to allow the parties an opportunity for amicable settlement, with a final hearing scheduled for 06.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the parties' claim of a settlement but adjourned the matter to 09.02.2023 to allow for the uploading of the settlement deed and to verify the status with Respondent No. 2 (ICICI Bank).
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to allow the parties to complete formalities regarding a settlement between the appellant and respondents. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 04.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal recorded a settlement proposal from Respondent No. 1 to pay Rs. 70 lacs to ICICI Bank and Rs. 20 lacs to the appellant upon disposal of the flat, directing Respondent No. 1 to formally send this proposal in writing.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a written settlement proposal to ICICI Bank and instructed both parties to exchange settlement proposals and for the bank to produce applicable RBI guidelines.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the matter is likely to be settled out of court and adjourned the appeal to 31.08.2022 for further orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside an ex-parte order against Respondent No. 1 and disposed of the interim relief application by recording a settlement agreement where the parties agreed to settle the matter amicably, contingent upon the respondent foreclosing the loan with ICICI Bank.
For Order
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to file a recall application regarding an ex-parte order and scheduled the matter for July 13, 2022, to address the interim relief request and the recall application.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed respondent no. 2 (ICICI Bank) to produce relevant legal provisions regarding its authority to auction the flat under the SARFAESI Act and ordered that proceedings against respondent no. 1 proceed ex-parte due to their absence.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted respondent no. 2 an extension to file/upload their reply on the e-portal and directed the case be listed for further orders on 08.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted Respondent No. 2 (ICICI Bank) a final three-day opportunity to file a reply to the appeal and scheduled the next hearing for July 4, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to implead ICICI Bank as a proforma party to the appeal and directed the appellant to amend the appeal within three days.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.04.2022 to consider an application filed by the appellant to implead ICICI Bank Ltd. as a respondent and the subsequent objection filed by the respondent.
Final Hearing
The matter was heard via video conferencing, and the Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a final hearing.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted ICICI Bank Ltd. one week to file a Vakalatnama and objections to an impleadment application, with the next hearing scheduled for January 10, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal issued notice to ICICI Bank Limited regarding an application for impleadment and directed the appellant's counsel to serve summons dasti.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file a physical copy of an application to implead ICICI Bank and scheduled the matter for consideration on 24.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to implead ICICI Bank as a party to the proceedings due to the existence of a tripartite agreement.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 21.10.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal and scheduled it for a subsequent hearing on 28.09.2021.
Hearing
The case was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike by the Oudh Bar Association, with the matter rescheduled for April 1, 2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal once defects are verified.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within 15 days and instructed the appellant to remove registry defects and file a reply accordingly.
Tribunal Order #0901126003512021-31-08-2022
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a written settlement proposal to ICICI Bank and instructed both parties to exchange settlement proposals and for the bank to produce applicable RBI guidelines.
Tribunal Order #0901126003512021-13-07-2022
The Tribunal set aside an ex-parte order against Respondent No. 1 and disposed of the interim relief application by recording a settlement agreement where the parties agreed to settle the matter amicably, contingent upon the respondent foreclosing the loan with ICICI Bank.
Tribunal Order #0901126003512021-18-04-2022
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to implead ICICI Bank as a proforma party to the appeal and directed the appellant to amend the appeal within three days.
Tribunal Order #0901126003512021-16-09-2022
The Tribunal recorded a settlement proposal from Respondent No. 1 to pay Rs. 70 lacs to ICICI Bank and Rs. 20 lacs to the appellant upon disposal of the flat, directing Respondent No. 1 to formally send this proposal in writing.
Tribunal Order #0901126003512021-08-07-2022
The Tribunal directed respondent no. 2 (ICICI Bank) to produce relevant legal provisions regarding its authority to auction the flat under the SARFAESI Act and ordered that proceedings against respondent no. 1 proceed ex-parte due to their absence.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as withdrawn Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as withdrawn
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhinav Singh
- Shashank Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
- Raj Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a written settlement proposal to ICICI Bank and instructed both parties to exchange settlement proposals and for the bank to produce applicable RBI guidelines.
The Tribunal set aside an ex-parte order against Respondent No. 1 and disposed of the interim relief application by recording a settlement agreement where the parties agreed to settle the matter amicably, contingent upon the respondent foreclosing the loan with ICICI Bank.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to implead ICICI Bank as a proforma party to the appeal and directed the appellant to amend the appeal within three days.
The Tribunal recorded a settlement proposal from Respondent No. 1 to pay Rs. 70 lacs to ICICI Bank and Rs. 20 lacs to the appellant upon disposal of the flat, directing Respondent No. 1 to formally send this proposal in writing.
The Tribunal directed respondent no. 2 (ICICI Bank) to produce relevant legal provisions regarding its authority to auction the flat under the SARFAESI Act and ordered that proceedings against respondent no. 1 proceed ex-parte due to their absence.
Need to research all rulings for sunworld residency private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.