Appellant / Complainant
Nitin Srivastava
Respondent
Sikka Infrastructure Private Limited
sikka infrastructure private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126005562021 by Nitin Srivastava against Sikka Infrastructure Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellant withdrew the appeal because the Respondent failed to comply with previous RERA directions regarding alternative unit provision, allowing the Appellant to instead proceed with the execution of interest payments as per direction no. 5 of the original order.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, directing parties to upload pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 27.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for April 13, 2021.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal due to a lawyers' strike called by the Oudh Bar Association and rescheduled the matter for 23.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent, setting a timeline for the exchange of pleadings via email and the e-portal.
Tribunal Order #0901126005562021-27-10-2021
The Appellant withdrew the appeal because the Respondent failed to comply with previous RERA directions regarding alternative unit provision, allowing the Appellant to instead proceed with the execution of interest payments as per direction no. 5 of the original order.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellant withdrew the appeal because the Respondent failed to comply with previous RERA directions regarding alternative unit provision, allowing the Appellant to instead proceed with the execution of interest payments as per direction no. 5 of the original order. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: Rs. 5/- per sq. feet per month and MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellant withdrew the appeal because the Respondent failed to comply with previous RERA directions regarding alternative unit provision, allowing the Appellant to instead proceed with the execution of interest payments as per direction no. 5 of the original order.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
Rs. 5/- per sq. feet per month and MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from 03.12.2015 to 30.04.2016 and from 01.05.2016 till CC/OC received
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shishir Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sunendra Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellant withdrew the appeal because the Respondent failed to comply with previous RERA directions regarding alternative unit provision, allowing the Appellant to instead proceed with the execution of interest payments as per direction no. 5 of the original order.
Need to research all rulings for sikka infrastructure private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.