up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126008672025

Appellant / Complainant

Capital Infratechomes Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Yogesh Bansal

Developer Firm

capital infratechomes private limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Unfair Cancellation & Forfeiture

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

7 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126008672025 by Capital Infratechomes Private Limited against Yogesh Bansal before up_rera.

Unfair Cancellation & Forfeiture
2
Stage 109/07/2025

For Order

The Tribunal condoned a 14-day delay in filing the review petition but ultimately dismissed the petition, ruling that seeking a review of a consent-based order to adjudicate the validity of a cancellation order was misconceived and contrary to judicial propriety.

3
Stage 215/05/2025

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request to list the case on 09.07.2025 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and share a soft copy, with the appellant permitted one week thereafter to file a reply. The matter is scheduled for hearing/orders on 15.05.2025.

5
Stage 424/03/2025

For Order

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding the review petition and directed the applicant to serve the notice and petition via post and email, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 21.04.2025.

6
Stage 5Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126008672025-09-07-2025

The Tribunal condoned a 14-day delay in filing the review petition but ultimately dismissed the petition, ruling that seeking a review of a consent-based order to adjudicate the validity of a cancellation order was misconceived and contrary to judicial propriety.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal condoned a 14-day delay in filing the review petition but ultimately dismissed the petition, ruling that seeking a review of a consent-based order to adjudicate the validity of a cancellation order was misconceived and contrary to judicial propriety. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal condoned a 14-day delay in filing the review petition but ultimately dismissed the petition, ruling that seeking a review of a consent-based order to adjudicate the validity of a cancellation order was misconceived and contrary to judicial propriety.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 11(5)

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126008672025-09-07-2025

The Tribunal condoned a 14-day delay in filing the review petition but ultimately dismissed the petition, ruling that seeking a review of a consent-based order to adjudicate the validity of a cancellation order was misconceived and contrary to judicial propriety.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for capital infratechomes private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →