Appellant / Complainant
Vatika Nirman Private Limited
Respondent
Shashank Gupta
vatika nirman private limited
₹12,00,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009082024 by Vatika Nirman Private Limited against Shashank Gupta before up_rera.
For Order
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession for future dates, ruling that the complaints were premature as the promised dates of possession had not yet arrived.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the appeal hearing for 14.05.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next date.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal has noted that pleadings are complete and, upon the joint request of counsel for both parties, adjourned the matter to 09.05.2024 for hearing.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the respondent's counsel and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.04.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, with the matter listed for hearing on 12.04.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal after determining that no deposit is required under Section 43(5) of the Act, and granted the respondent one week to file objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126009082024-14-05-2024
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession for future dates, ruling that the complaints were premature as the promised dates of possession had not yet arrived.
Tribunal Order #0901126009082024-23-02-2024
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal after determining that no deposit is required under Section 43(5) of the Act, and granted the respondent one week to file objections.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession for future dates, ruling that the complaints were premature as the promised dates of possession had not yet arrived. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession for future dates, ruling that the complaints were premature as the promised dates of possession had not yet arrived.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
- Aahuti Agarwal
- N A
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
- Suryansh Narula
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order directing possession for future dates, ruling that the complaints were premature as the promised dates of possession had not yet arrived.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal after determining that no deposit is required under Section 43(5) of the Act, and granted the respondent one week to file objections.
Need to research all rulings for vatika nirman private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.