Appellant / Complainant
Pardeep Kumar
Respondent
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
u.p. avas evam vikas parishad
₹85,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009122020 by Pardeep Kumar against U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order dated 27.05.2020, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by hearing the respondent in the appellant's absence and failing to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to additional replies; consequently, the matter is remanded for a fresh examination.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard oral arguments from the appellant and respondent, but the judgment has been reserved.
Final Hearing
The court heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent, but reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to serve a copy of its additional reply filed on 16.03.2020 via affidavit and ordered the appellant to submit a response regarding how the non-service prejudiced his case and violated principles of natural justice.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 01.11.2021 due to the appellant's absence and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to submit objections regarding the allegation that an additional reply was filed and arguments were heard without serving the appellant or in their absence, potentially violating principles of natural justice.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 22.03.2021 due to an ongoing strike by advocates and directed the Registry to comply with a previous order regarding the conversion of the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
For Order
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the Registry to summon the original records from the RERA office for further hearing.
Notice
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal after defects were removed and granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126009122020-30-06-2022
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order dated 27.05.2020, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by hearing the respondent in the appellant's absence and failing to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to additional replies; consequently, the matter is remanded for a fresh examination.
Tribunal Order #0901126009122020-01-11-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to serve a copy of its additional reply filed on 16.03.2020 via affidavit and ordered the appellant to submit a response regarding how the non-service prejudiced his case and violated principles of natural justice.
Tribunal Order #0901126009122020-22-03-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to submit objections regarding the allegation that an additional reply was filed and arguments were heard without serving the appellant or in their absence, potentially violating principles of natural justice.
Tribunal Order #0901126009122020-09-02-2021
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the Registry to summon the original records from the RERA office for further hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order dated 27.05.2020, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by hearing the respondent in the appellant's absence and failing to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to additional replies; consequently, the matter is remanded for a fresh examination. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order dated 27.05.2020, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by hearing the respondent in the appellant's absence and failing to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to additional replies; consequently, the matter is remanded for a fresh examination.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- In Person
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
- Akhand Pratap Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order dated 27.05.2020, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by hearing the respondent in the appellant's absence and failing to provide the appellant an opportunity to respond to additional replies; consequently, the matter is remanded for a fresh examination.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to serve a copy of its additional reply filed on 16.03.2020 via affidavit and ordered the appellant to submit a response regarding how the non-service prejudiced his case and violated principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to submit objections regarding the allegation that an additional reply was filed and arguments were heard without serving the appellant or in their absence, potentially violating principles of natural justice.
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed the Registry to summon the original records from the RERA office for further hearing.
Need to research all rulings for u.p. avas evam vikas parishad?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.