up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126009772020

Appellant / Complainant

Anurag Verma

VS

Respondent

Parsvnath Developers Ltd.

Developer Firm

parsvnath developers ltd.

Disputed Amount

23,00,000

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional MisrepresentationUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

7 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009772020 by Anurag Verma against Parsvnath Developers Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional MisrepresentationUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 122/09/2021

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of his compensation claim, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate losses or mental agony as required under Sections 71 and 72 of the Act, 2016.

3
Stage 225/01/2021

For Order

No text available.

4
Stage 306/01/2021

Notice

No text available.

5
Stage 408/12/2020

Notice

No text available.

6
Stage 5Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126009772020-22-09-2021

The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of his compensation claim, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate losses or mental agony as required under Sections 71 and 72 of the Act, 2016.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of his compensation claim, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate losses or mental agony as required under Sections 71 and 72 of the Act, 2016. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of his compensation claim, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate losses or mental agony as required under Sections 71 and 72 of the Act, 2016.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from the date of first payment made by the appellant till the actual date of refund

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12Section 11(5)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • In Person

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126009772020-22-09-2021

The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Adjudicating Officer's rejection of his compensation claim, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate losses or mental agony as required under Sections 71 and 72 of the Act, 2016.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for parsvnath developers ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →