Appellant / Complainant
Ashok Kumar Lal
Respondent
Imperia Structures Ltd.
imperia structures ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010042020 by Ashok Kumar Lal against Imperia Structures Ltd. before up_rera.
For Order
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal, and with no objection from the respondent, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to ongoing settlement negotiations and rescheduled the matter for 10.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the Respondent's proposal for an amicable settlement and directed both parties to attempt a resolution before the next hearing scheduled for 30.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the appearance of a Director instead of the CMD/MD as previously directed and ordered that the CMD/MD must appear at the next hearing to explain queries raised in the order dated 04.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an exemption for the Respondent's CMD to appear due to illness and rescheduled the hearing to 06.09.2022, with a directive that the CMD must appear in person on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the CMD of the respondent to appear personally to explain why physical possession has not been provided despite the execution of a Sub Lease Deed. The order also mandates that the respondent communicate this directive to the concerned person for compliance.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent despite three revisions to the list and ordered the appeal to be relisted for hearing on 04.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to resolve a technical issue regarding documents not appearing on the e-portal dashboard and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel three days to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 05.07.2022 and scheduled the next hearing for 19.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce specific documents, including project advertisements, the appellant's complaint, and the allotment letter, and to provide soft copies of these documents to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an affidavit from a competent person regarding the memo of possession of the unit, following the appellant's grievance that possession was not granted despite the execution of the conveyance deed.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a personal emergency and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.05.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment filed by the appellant's counsel due to his engagement in the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for 12.05.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-581/2020 to 27.04.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections and a vakalatnama, while allowing the appellant one week to file a reply. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 11.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the e-portal before the next hearing on 22.03.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 24.11.2021 because the respondent failed to file an objection against the limitation application despite being given a final opportunity.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to file an objection against the limitation application and adjourned the matter to 29.09.2021 for disposal of said application.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the respondent was served notice and directed the respondent to file objections to the limitation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal by the next hearing date.
Tribunal Order #0901126010042020-05-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce specific documents, including project advertisements, the appellant's complaint, and the allotment letter, and to provide soft copies of these documents to the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126010042020-01-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an affidavit from a competent person regarding the memo of possession of the unit, following the appellant's grievance that possession was not granted despite the execution of the conveyance deed.
Tribunal Order #0901126010042020-06-09-2022
The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the appearance of a Director instead of the CMD/MD as previously directed and ordered that the CMD/MD must appear at the next hearing to explain queries raised in the order dated 04.08.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126010042020-04-08-2022
The Tribunal directed the CMD of the respondent to appear personally to explain why physical possession has not been provided despite the execution of a Sub Lease Deed. The order also mandates that the respondent communicate this directive to the concerned person for compliance.
Tribunal Order #0901126010042020-14-12-2021
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as withdrawn Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as withdrawn
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Surendra Kumar Mishra
- Om Prakash Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sarvesh Tiwari
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce specific documents, including project advertisements, the appellant's complaint, and the allotment letter, and to provide soft copies of these documents to the appellant.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an affidavit from a competent person regarding the memo of possession of the unit, following the appellant's grievance that possession was not granted despite the execution of the conveyance deed.
The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the appearance of a Director instead of the CMD/MD as previously directed and ordered that the CMD/MD must appear at the next hearing to explain queries raised in the order dated 04.08.2022.
The Tribunal directed the CMD of the respondent to appear personally to explain why physical possession has not been provided despite the execution of a Sub Lease Deed. The order also mandates that the respondent communicate this directive to the concerned person for compliance.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing COVID-19 related relaxations granted by the Supreme Court, and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Need to research all rulings for imperia structures ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.