Appellant / Complainant
Dinesh Kumar Valecha
Respondent
Aura Build Well Pvt. Ltd.
aura build well pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010382020 by Dinesh Kumar Valecha against Aura Build Well Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 209 days and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 222 of 2020 due to failure to show sufficient cause.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal declared the notice to the respondent sufficient through newspaper publication and proceeded ex-parte against them. The case is scheduled for 03.08.2023 to consider an application for condonation of delay and for an ex-parte hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal on 13.07.2023 for orders or hearing.
Delay condonation
The court granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the matter for May 31, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 06.12.2022 and granted the respondent a final opportunity to file an objection against the delay condonation application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the case for hearing on 10.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that despite publication of notice in the newspaper, no one appeared for the respondent; consequently, the case is listed for 09.09.2022 to address objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has ordered the case to be listed for a subsequent hearing on 10.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the applicant a 10-day extension to ensure compliance with a previous order dated 19.05.2022 and rescheduled the case listing for 05.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to serve notice on the respondent through publication in two daily newspapers (one Hindi and one English) and scheduled the next hearing for 11.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application seeking permission to serve notice to the respondent via newspaper publication after postal service failed.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the counsel for the applicant due to illness and rescheduled the case for May 6, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 29.04.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the applicant to take necessary steps following a previous order dated 07.12.2021 and scheduled the matter for further orders on 07.02.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal allowed an adjournment application despite the counsel's history of non-appearance, imposing a cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the Tribunal fund and directing notice to be issued to the respondent.
Notice
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 07.12.2021 in the interest of justice due to the absence of the opposite party.
Delay condonation
The case was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike, with instructions to issue notice to the respondent and list the matter on 15.11.2021 for disposal of the limitation application.
Tribunal Order #0901126010382020-03-08-2023
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 209 days and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 222 of 2020 due to failure to show sufficient cause.
Tribunal Order #0901126010382020-07-12-2021
The Tribunal allowed an adjournment application despite the counsel's history of non-appearance, imposing a cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the Tribunal fund and directing notice to be issued to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126010382020-13-07-2023
The Tribunal declared the notice to the respondent sufficient through newspaper publication and proceeded ex-parte against them. The case is scheduled for 03.08.2023 to consider an application for condonation of delay and for an ex-parte hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 209 days and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 222 of 2020 due to failure to show sufficient cause. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 209 days and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 222 of 2020 due to failure to show sufficient cause.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Umesh Kumar Shivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- In Person
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 209 days and subsequently dismissed Misc. Case No. 222 of 2020 due to failure to show sufficient cause.
The Tribunal allowed an adjournment application despite the counsel's history of non-appearance, imposing a cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the Tribunal fund and directing notice to be issued to the respondent.
The Tribunal declared the notice to the respondent sufficient through newspaper publication and proceeded ex-parte against them. The case is scheduled for 03.08.2023 to consider an application for condonation of delay and for an ex-parte hearing.
Need to research all rulings for aura build well pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.