Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Adjudicating Officer, Sahil Gupta
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010872025 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Adjudicating Officer, Sahil Gupta before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant-promoter failed to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016, and directed the executing authority to proceed with the recovery of the decretal amount.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellant, scheduling the case for orders on 23.02.2026, with a warning that failure to appear will result in ex parte proceedings.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 by depositing the Recovery Certificate amount of Rs. 7,99,214 plus interest, and further ordered the uploading of possession offers and demand notices computed as per Section 18(1).
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and rescheduled the case for orders/hearing on 19.01.2026.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted Respondents No. 1 and 3 ten days to file objections and allowed the appellant seven days to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for 11.12.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal confirmed sufficient service of notice on Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and granted them 10 days to file objections, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 17.11.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the next hearing for September 22, 2025, following objections raised by respondent No. 2.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on September 8, 2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal to include a challenge regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer, noting that jurisdiction is a fundamental issue that requires examination.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file an amendment application regarding the order dated 26.06.2025, with a subsequent week for the respondent to file objections.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the hearing for the defective appeal on 21.07.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the array of respondents and directed the issuance of notice to the respondents for the next hearing on 02.07.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an amendment application to implead UP RERA as a party and granted liberty to file an application regarding claims in pending execution proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126010872025-19-01-2026
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 by depositing the Recovery Certificate amount of Rs. 7,99,214 plus interest, and further ordered the uploading of possession offers and demand notices computed as per Section 18(1).
Tribunal Order #0901126010872025-23-02-2026
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant-promoter failed to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016, and directed the executing authority to proceed with the recovery of the decretal amount.
Tribunal Order #0901126010872025-12-08-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal to include a challenge regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer, noting that jurisdiction is a fundamental issue that requires examination.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant-promoter failed to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016, and directed the executing authority to proceed with the recovery of the decretal amount. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant-promoter failed to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016, and directed the executing authority to proceed with the recovery of the decretal amount.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Syed Mohammad Abid
- Snigdha Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 by depositing the Recovery Certificate amount of Rs. 7,99,214 plus interest, and further ordered the uploading of possession offers and demand notices computed as per Section 18(1).
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the appellant-promoter failed to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016, and directed the executing authority to proceed with the recovery of the decretal amount.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal to include a challenge regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer, noting that jurisdiction is a fundamental issue that requires examination.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.