up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126011332023

Appellant / Complainant

Madhup Verma

VS

Respondent

M I Builders Private Limited

Developer Firm

m i builders private limited

Disputed Amount

16,10,305

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

31 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126011332023 by Madhup Verma against M I Builders Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes
2
Stage 127/02/2026

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Madhup Verma, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to deny compensation as the appellant failed to prove any loss or deficiency in service regarding area discrepancies, delayed possession, or structural defects.

3
Stage 209/12/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for both parties regarding Appeal-223/2023 and has reserved the judgment for further consideration.

4
Stage 327/11/2025

Part Heard

No text available.

5
Stage 418/11/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal noted that the matter is part-heard with another Bench and ordered the appeal to be listed before the appropriate Bench on 27.11.2025.

6
Stage 528/10/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 18.11.2025 for orders/hearing due to the absence of the respondent's counsel.

7
Stage 622/09/2025

Part Heard

No text available.

8
Stage 702/09/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel additional time to complete arguments and scheduled the appeal for further arguments on 22.09.2025.

9
Stage 812/08/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to upload necessary documents and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, listing the matter for September 2, 2025.

10
Stage 924/07/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.08.2025.

11
Stage 1003/07/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file a reply to the appellant's calculation chart affidavit and scheduled the next hearing for July 24, 2025.

12
Stage 1123/05/2025

Notice

The Tribunal recorded the arguments presented by both counsels and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on July 3, 2025.

13
Stage 1208/05/2025

Notice

The Tribunal granted an adjournment as the counsel for the appellant was unable to appear due to a bereavement in his family. The matter is rescheduled for hearing on 23.05.2025.

14
Stage 1323/04/2025

Notice

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 08.05.2025.

15
Stage 1427/03/2025

Notice

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to him being out of station and rescheduled the case for orders/hearing on 23.04.2025.

16
Stage 1525/02/2025

Notice

The appeal was adjourned due to a strike by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 27.03.2025.

17
Stage 1604/02/2025

Notice

The matter was adjourned to 25.02.2025 for hearing upon the request of the respondent's counsel, as no one appeared for the appellant.

18
Stage 1716/01/2025

For Order

Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for orders or hearing on 04.02.2025.

19
Stage 1805/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a six-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal before proceeding to hear the merits.

20
Stage 1905/07/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

21
Stage 2008/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a personal emergency and rescheduled the hearing for July 5, 2024.

22
Stage 2105/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the matter for May 8, 2024, to consider the application for condonation of delay.

23
Stage 2201/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has issued a routine procedural order to list the appeal on 05.04.2024.

24
Stage 2322/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that the reply to the objection has been filed and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 1, 2024.

25
Stage 2418/10/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

26
Stage 2512/09/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

27
Stage 2621/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, adjourning the matter to 12.09.2023.

28
Stage 2710/05/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

29
Stage 2829/03/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding the applicant's application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.05.2023.

30
Stage 29Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126011332023-27-02-2026

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Madhup Verma, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to deny compensation as the appellant failed to prove any loss or deficiency in service regarding area discrepancies, delayed possession, or structural defects.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Madhup Verma, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to deny compensation as the appellant failed to prove any loss or deficiency in service regarding area discrepancies, delayed possession, or structural defects. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Madhup Verma, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to deny compensation as the appellant failed to prove any loss or deficiency in service regarding area discrepancies, delayed possession, or structural defects.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 14(3)Section 12Section 11(4)(d)Section 19(6)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Madhusudan Srivastava

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Paavan Awasthi

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126011332023-27-02-2026

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Madhup Verma, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to deny compensation as the appellant failed to prove any loss or deficiency in service regarding area discrepancies, delayed possession, or structural defects.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for m i builders private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →