up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126012462020

Appellant / Complainant

Baya Weaver Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Sagar Khatuja

Developer Firm

baya weaver ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012462020 by Baya Weaver Ltd. against Sagar Khatuja before up_rera.

2
Stage 111/07/2022

Delay condonation

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the case (MISC. CASE-521/2020) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

3
Stage 219/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional 10 days to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for July 11, 2022.

4
Stage 326/04/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide copies of the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal via email to the respondent, establishing a timeline for subsequent objections and replies.

5
Stage 421/03/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and serve a copy to the applicant via email before the next hearing on 26.04.2022.

6
Stage 521/01/2022

Further Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 622/12/2021

Further Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to take necessary steps following a previous order and issued a notice returnable on 21.01.2022.

8
Stage 725/11/2021

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's new counsel and directed that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email.

9
Stage 829/10/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal noted a potential settlement between the parties and adjourned the matter to 25.11.2021 for further orders.

10
Stage 907/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment at the request of the applicant's counsel to allow for the filing of a vakalatnama and potential amicable settlement, rescheduling the case to 29.10.2021.

11
Stage 1022/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a one-week adjournment to allow the applicant's counsel to file a vakalatnama and directed the matter to be listed on 07.10.2021.

12
Stage 1103/05/2021

For Order

No text available.

13
Stage 1209/04/2021

For Order

No text available.

14
Stage 1323/03/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel due to his unavailability at the High Court and rescheduled the case for 09.04.2021.

15
Stage 1402/03/2021

For Order

The case is adjourned due to a lawyer strike called by the Oudh Bar Association and is rescheduled for hearing on 23.03.2021.

16
Stage 1502/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to rectify stamp deficiencies and directed both parties to exchange applications for condonation of delay and objections via email before the next hearing on 02.03.2021.

17
Stage 1608/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

18
Stage 1702/12/2020

Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012462020-11-07-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the case (MISC. CASE-521/2020) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the case (MISC. CASE-521/2020) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the case (MISC. CASE-521/2020) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Mandeep Singh
  • Saurabh Misra
  • Vikas Kumar Verma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Pankaj Tewari
  • Arun Kumar Tripathi
  • Chandra Bhushan Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012462020-11-07-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the case (MISC. CASE-521/2020) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for baya weaver ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →