up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126012972021

Appellant / Complainant

Deepak Bichhoria, Anil Gopalani, Imran Ahmad, Geetanjali Vig, Ramesh Bhojwani, Vaibhav Agarwal

VS

Respondent

Gayatri Developwell Pvt Ltd

Developer Firm

gayatri developwell pvt ltd

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012972021 by Deepak Bichhoria, Anil Gopalani, Imran Ahmad, Geetanjali Vig, Ramesh Bhojwani, Vaibhav Agarwal against Gayatri Developwell Pvt Ltd before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 106/04/2022

Further Order

The Appellate Tribunal remanded the appeal back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits, noting that previous dismissals based on the definition of 'allottee' under Section 2(d) were inconsistent with prior rulings on similar facts.

3
Stage 207/03/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal directed the respondent to upload their reply to the grounds of appeal on the e-Portal and instructed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing date.

4
Stage 324/12/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period and granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply before the next hearing on 24.01.2022.

5
Stage 426/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections regarding limitation due to non-appearance and adjourned the matter to 24.12.2021.

6
Stage 509/11/2021

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.

7
Stage 606/10/2021

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for November 9, 2021.

8
Stage 709/09/2021

For Order

The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange copies of the memo of appeal, objections, and replies via email within specified timelines and ordered the filing of documents on the e-portal before the next hearing on 06.10.2021.

9
Stage 827/04/2021

For Order

No text available.

10
Stage 902/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1004/03/2021

Defect Removal

No text available.

12
Stage 1124/02/2021

Defect Removal

This document is a formal header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-170/2021) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, containing the names of the parties and the presiding members, but does not contain any substantive ruling or directive.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012972021-06-04-2022

The Appellate Tribunal remanded the appeal back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits, noting that previous dismissals based on the definition of 'allottee' under Section 2(d) were inconsistent with prior rulings on similar facts.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012972021-09-11-2021

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal remanded the appeal back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits, noting that previous dismissals based on the definition of 'allottee' under Section 2(d) were inconsistent with prior rulings on similar facts. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal remanded the appeal back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits, noting that previous dismissals based on the definition of 'allottee' under Section 2(d) were inconsistent with prior rulings on similar facts.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Anuj Tandon

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Siddharth Nandwani

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012972021-06-04-2022

The Appellate Tribunal remanded the appeal back to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits, noting that previous dismissals based on the definition of 'allottee' under Section 2(d) were inconsistent with prior rulings on similar facts.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012972021-09-11-2021

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gayatri developwell pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →