Appellant / Complainant
Ajay Joshi
Respondent
M R Mittals Infratech Private Limited
m r mittals infratech private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013262022 by Ajay Joshi against M R Mittals Infratech Private Limited before up_rera.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is entitled to delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the BBA completion date (22.05.2016) until the offer of possession (01.06.2019), rather than the requested 24% interest rate.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 20.05.2025.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 24.04.2025 for orders/hearing following a joint request from both parties.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 26.03.2025.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the case for orders on March 3, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay of 539 days, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Hearing
The court granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for January 28, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for orders on January 2, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that advocates are abstaining from judicial work and no litigants appeared in person; consequently, the appeal is scheduled for hearing on 04-12-2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 4, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and, upon the respondent's request, adjourned the matter to 23.09.2024 for final hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders or hearing on 20.08.2024 following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request from counsel, adjourned the matter for orders/hearing on 17.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal notes that pleadings have been exchanged and schedules the appeal for a hearing on 18.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing of the appeal to 21.03.2024 based on a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to an urgent matter at the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for 22.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for October 6, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request from both parties' counsels to adjourn the hearing, rescheduling the appeal for 24.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 13.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for February 10, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for further orders on 21.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto Writ (C) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the registry to register the appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 22.09.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and a Vakalatnama, and scheduled the matter for August 24, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file an application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 26.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of notice and filing objections regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126013262022-20-05-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is entitled to delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the BBA completion date (22.05.2016) until the offer of possession (01.06.2019), rather than the requested 24% interest rate.
Tribunal Order #0901126013262022-22-09-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto Writ (C) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the registry to register the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126013262022-28-01-2025
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay of 539 days, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is entitled to delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the BBA completion date (22.05.2016) until the offer of possession (01.06.2019), rather than the requested 24% interest rate. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is entitled to delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the BBA completion date (22.05.2016) until the offer of possession (01.06.2019), rather than the requested 24% interest rate.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1%
Interest Period
w.e.f. 22.05.2016 till offer of possession i.e. 01.06.2019
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Nandwani
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is entitled to delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the BBA completion date (22.05.2016) until the offer of possession (01.06.2019), rather than the requested 24% interest rate.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto Writ (C) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the registry to register the appeal.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay of 539 days, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for m r mittals infratech private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.