Appellant / Complainant
Tanya Agarwal
Respondent
M/s Supertech Realtors Pvt. Ltd
supertech realtors pvt. ltd.
₹1,27,77,775
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013372020 by Tanya Agarwal against M/s Supertech Realtors Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that directed the allottee to take possession and pay dues, ruling that the promoter's complaint was not maintainable because they had previously cancelled the allotment and failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.05.2022 due to lack of time following arguments from both counsels.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of a condonation of delay application and hearing on 16.05.2022 at the request of the appellant's counsel.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to upload their objections on the e-portal and scheduled the case for hearing on 15.04.2022 regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to address discrepancies regarding the filing of objections on the e-portal and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 25.03.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to a medical emergency and directed the respondent to upload their objection on the e-portal and file it with the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 11.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and objection, adjourning the matter to 17.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for November 22, 2021, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a personal bereavement and rescheduled the matter for October 27, 2021, with directions for parties to exchange pleadings.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent reply due from the applicant within one week.
For Order
The appeal was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike called by the Oudh Bar Association and is scheduled for a new hearing on 23.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and set a timeline for the exchange of objections and replies via email and the e-Portal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to prepare her brief and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 03.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126013372020-30-06-2022
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that directed the allottee to take possession and pay dues, ruling that the promoter's complaint was not maintainable because they had previously cancelled the allotment and failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
Tribunal Order #0901126013372020-21-02-2022
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to a medical emergency and directed the respondent to upload their objection on the e-portal and file it with the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that directed the allottee to take possession and pay dues, ruling that the promoter's complaint was not maintainable because they had previously cancelled the allotment and failed to approach the authority with clean hands. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that directed the allottee to take possession and pay dues, ruling that the promoter's complaint was not maintainable because they had previously cancelled the allotment and failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Fuhar Gupta
- Prashant Kumar
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA orders that directed the allottee to take possession and pay dues, ruling that the promoter's complaint was not maintainable because they had previously cancelled the allotment and failed to approach the authority with clean hands.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to a medical emergency and directed the respondent to upload their objection on the e-portal and file it with the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.
Need to research all rulings for supertech realtors pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.