up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126014592020

Appellant / Complainant

Brick Rise Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Antaryami Kumar, Anr

Developer Firm

brick rise developers pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

17,51,901

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014592020 by Brick Rise Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Antaryami Kumar, Anr before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes
2
Stage 122/03/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund to respondents, ruling that the developer did not misrepresent facts or commit illegality by correcting lease rent and tax amounts in a subsequent allotment letter.

3
Stage 202/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding allegations of misrepresentation by the appellant and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 308/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a one-time adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness but issued a stern warning that future requests for adjournment by co-counsel will not be entertained.

5
Stage 414/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the applicant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings at least three days before the next hearing on 08.10.2021.

6
Stage 529/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 606/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 718/03/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's directions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic limitation extension, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

9
Stage 825/02/2021

For Order

The case was adjourned because advocates were abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; the defective appeal is scheduled for listing on 18.03.2021.

10
Stage 903/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a copy of the affidavit for condonation of delay to the respondents and established a timeline for filing objections and replies via email and the e-Portal.

11
Stage 1019/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1111/12/2020

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014592020-22-03-2022

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund to respondents, ruling that the developer did not misrepresent facts or commit illegality by correcting lease rent and tax amounts in a subsequent allotment letter.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014592020-18-03-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's directions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic limitation extension, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund to respondents, ruling that the developer did not misrepresent facts or commit illegality by correcting lease rent and tax amounts in a subsequent allotment letter. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund to respondents, ruling that the developer did not misrepresent facts or commit illegality by correcting lease rent and tax amounts in a subsequent allotment letter.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12Section 11(4)(d)Section 19(6)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Sunil Kumar Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Madhusudan Srivastava

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014592020-22-03-2022

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the U.P. RERA Regulatory Authority's order directing a refund to respondents, ruling that the developer did not misrepresent facts or commit illegality by correcting lease rent and tax amounts in a subsequent allotment letter.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014592020-18-03-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's directions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic limitation extension, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for brick rise developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →