up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126014992022

Appellant / Complainant

Akhilesh Prakash Verma, Anju Verma

VS

Respondent

Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

gaursons hi-tech infrastructure pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

31 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014992022 by Akhilesh Prakash Verma, Anju Verma against Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

2
Stage 105/12/2024

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to appear and a history of seeking continuous adjournments.

3
Stage 206/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for December 5, 2024.

4
Stage 326/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that amicable settlement discussions are ongoing between the parties and adjourned the matter to 06.11.2024 to allow the respondent to seek further instructions.

5
Stage 423/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 26.09.2024 for orders/hearing following a joint request by both parties.

6
Stage 518/07/2024

Hearing

Upon a joint request from the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 23.08.2024.

7
Stage 617/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 707/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for urgency and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on May 17, 2024.

9
Stage 804/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel due to him being out of station and rescheduled the hearing for 07.05.2024.

10
Stage 929/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 04.04.2024.

11
Stage 1002/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file the original online complaint and requested clarification regarding any amendments sought in the prayer or grounds of said complaint.

12
Stage 1103/11/2023

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1221/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 03-11-2023.

14
Stage 1308/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the hearing for September 21, 2023.

15
Stage 1426/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

16
Stage 1525/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to an accident involving the lead advocate and rescheduled the hearing for 26.05.2023.

17
Stage 1627/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to ensure visible copies of documents are uploaded with the Registry and scheduled the case for hearing on 25.04.2023.

18
Stage 1728/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court precedents and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. Additionally, the Appellant was directed to rectify illegible annexures and re-file them with proper titles and numbering within 10 days.

19
Stage 1827/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

20
Stage 1920/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal closed the applicant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 27.01.2023.

21
Stage 2024/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent and uploaded to the e-portal. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 20.12.2022.

22
Stage 2107/11/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to provide soft copies of objections via email and upload them to the e-portal for specific cases, and scheduled the matter for 24.11.2022 for consideration of condonation of delay.

23
Stage 2228/09/2022

Notice

This document is a formal header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-354/2022) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, listing the parties involved and the presiding members, but it contains no substantive rulings or directives.

24
Stage 2309/09/2022

Notice

No text available.

25
Stage 2422/08/2022

Notice

The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide copies of the appeal memo and delay condonation application to the respondent, and ordered the respondent to file objections and replies before the next hearing on 09.09.2022.

26
Stage 2508/07/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove registry defects within 10 days and issued notice to the respondent for August 22, 2022, outlining specific procedures for service of process via speed-post and email.

27
Stage 2606/06/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal noted that the appellant failed to rectify registry defects and directed the applicant to remove said defects within one week, adjourning the matter to 08.07.2022.

28
Stage 27Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014992022-28-02-2023

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court precedents and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. Additionally, the Appellant was directed to rectify illegible annexures and re-file them with proper titles and numbering within 10 days.

29
Stage 28Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014992022-05-12-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to appear and a history of seeking continuous adjournments.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014992022-20-12-2022

The Tribunal closed the applicant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 27.01.2023.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to appear and a history of seeking continuous adjournments. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to appear and a history of seeking continuous adjournments.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Applicant/Appellant In-Person
  • Praveen K Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Samrat Vaish
  • Mohit Yadav
  • C P Singh Yadav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014992022-28-02-2023

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court precedents and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. Additionally, the Appellant was directed to rectify illegible annexures and re-file them with proper titles and numbering within 10 days.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014992022-05-12-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to appear and a history of seeking continuous adjournments.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014992022-20-12-2022

The Tribunal closed the applicant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 27.01.2023.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →