Appellant / Complainant
Amrita Kumari
Respondent
Aadi Best Consortium Private Limited
aadi best consortium private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126019232021 by Amrita Kumari against Aadi Best Consortium Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the parties reached an amicable settlement and the respondent promoter handed over possession of the unit to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment following a request from the appellant's counsel and a submission that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties; the case is rescheduled for 11.12.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 20.11.2025.
Hearing
The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment, and the Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 28.10.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment following an application by the appellant's counsel and noted that negotiations for an amicable settlement are ongoing. The matter is scheduled for the next hearing on 06.10.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment following a request from the appellant's counsel and a submission that the parties are negotiating an amicable settlement; the matter is rescheduled for 28.08.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections and allowed the appellant seven days thereafter to file a reply, adjourning the matter to 29.07.2025 due to the appellant's counsel's illness.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application dated 08.01.2025 and directed the issuance of fresh notices to the respondent for the next hearing scheduled on 04.07.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because the respondent company is under a moratorium issued by the NCLT under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's submission regarding an NCLT-issued moratorium and appointed a new hearing date of 31.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal appears to be within the limitation period and directed both parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon cases at least seven days before the next hearing on 20.04.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a flight cancellation and rescheduled the hearing for 28.01.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the inclusion of the Regulatory Authority's records and, upon the appellant's request, adjourned the defective appeal to 07.01.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the parties to upload documents to the e-portal, warning that the matter may proceed ex parte if the respondent fails to appear or file objections by the next hearing on 01.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and a reply to the appeal within a week and scheduled the defective appeal for further hearing on 09.11.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a vakalatnama and required the issuance of notice to the respondent via registered post and email, with the matter listed for further orders on 20.04.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126019232021-11-12-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the parties reached an amicable settlement and the respondent promoter handed over possession of the unit to the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126019232021-31-05-2022
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because the respondent company is under a moratorium issued by the NCLT under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the parties reached an amicable settlement and the respondent promoter handed over possession of the unit to the appellant. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the parties reached an amicable settlement and the respondent promoter handed over possession of the unit to the appellant.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ravi Shankar Kumar
Respondent Advocate(s)
- V. K. S. Bisen
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the parties reached an amicable settlement and the respondent promoter handed over possession of the unit to the appellant.
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because the respondent company is under a moratorium issued by the NCLT under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for aadi best consortium private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.