Appellant / Complainant
Shivam Maheshwari
Respondent
Swami Nirman Pvt. Ltd.
swami nirman pvt. ltd.
₹25,00,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126020192022 by Shivam Maheshwari against Swami Nirman Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Part Heard
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'aggrieved person' under the RERA Act because no formal allotment letter or agreement to sell was executed despite the deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/-.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 payable to the Tribunal Library, and stipulated that no further adjournments will be granted.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for orders along with Appeal No. 256 of 2022 before the appropriate Bench on 18.07.2025, as it is tied up with the Special Bench.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted that the matter is part-heard by another Bench and adjourned the appeal for hearing before the same Bench on 29.05.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 05.05.2025, while maintaining any existing interim orders.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent promoter and scheduled the next hearing for 10.04.2025, noting that the matter will proceed ex-parte if no appearance is made.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request to reschedule the hearing of the appeal to 03.04.2025 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. 256/2022 for the current orders.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal denied a request for adjournment by the respondent and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 06.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and ordered that Appeal-236/2022 be listed for orders on 17.01.2025, alongside the connected Appeal No. 256/2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.12.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 14.11.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 04.10.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal on 04.09.2024 to align with connected matters.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled a hearing for the defective appeal, specifically to consider the application for condonation of delay, on 07.08.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to the appellant's counsel being unavailable and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 08.07.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel due to their engagement in the High Court and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 09.05.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 08.04.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings are complete and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 5, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and rescheduled the defective appeal for orders/hearing on 06.02.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to being out of station and scheduled the matter for orders on 14.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and listed the defective appeal for consideration of the delay condonation application on 03.07.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the appellant's co-counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 21.04.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels to list the defective appeal on 03.02.2023 for further orders.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within 10 days and permitted the applicant to file a replication/rejoinder thereafter, scheduling the matter for 19.12.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on 17.11.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an objection to the respondent's application regarding the maintainability of the appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 15.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied cases at least 10 days prior to the next hearing and scheduled the matter for 18.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the delay condonation application within two weeks and permitted the applicant to file a rejoinder thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for July 5, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove registry defects and issued notice to the respondent, scheduling the next hearing for 25.05.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126020192022-03-09-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'aggrieved person' under the RERA Act because no formal allotment letter or agreement to sell was executed despite the deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/-.
Tribunal Order #0901126020192022-12-08-2025
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 payable to the Tribunal Library, and stipulated that no further adjournments will be granted.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'aggrieved person' under the RERA Act because no formal allotment letter or agreement to sell was executed despite the deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/-. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'aggrieved person' under the RERA Act because no formal allotment letter or agreement to sell was executed despite the deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/-.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anilesh Tewari
- Aprajita Bansal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Inder Preet Chadha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' or 'aggrieved person' under the RERA Act because no formal allotment letter or agreement to sell was executed despite the deposit of Rs. 25,00,000/-.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 payable to the Tribunal Library, and stipulated that no further adjournments will be granted.
Need to research all rulings for swami nirman pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.