Appellant / Complainant
Manjula Srivastava
Respondent
Wondrous Buildmart Private Limited, Eldeco Infrastructure Properties Ltd
wondrous buildmart private limited
₹2,80,061
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126023982021 by Manjula Srivastava against Wondrous Buildmart Private Limited, Eldeco Infrastructure Properties Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually or legally obligated under the RERA Act to facilitate subvention loans, and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order for a principal refund.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for both parties, and the judgment has been reserved.
Further Hearing
The proceedings for Appeal-347/2021 were adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled for hearing on 28.02.2023.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. 345/021 for the relevant directions.
Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 07.02.2023 and referred to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 345/2021.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the hearing for 06.02.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 3, 2023.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel two days to prepare his brief and rescheduled the appeal hearing for November 3, 2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and corrected a clerical error regarding dates in a previous order dated 02.09.2022.
Further Hearing
The respondent's counsel requested and was granted a one-week extension to seek instructions regarding the payment of interest on the appellant's deposit, excluding the COVID-19 pandemic period. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 23.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 02.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to study the agreement regarding the subvention scheme and adjourned the matter to 17.08.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 26.07.2022 because the appellant was absent and their counsel could not attend due to personal reasons.
Further Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 16.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned a five-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the Appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on January 27, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on January 6, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with the next hearing scheduled for 14.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the limitation application and grounds of appeal before the next hearing date, which is scheduled for 24.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the matter for 01.10.2021 to address a defective appeal and the disposal of a limitation application.
Tribunal Order #0901126023982021-30-05-2023
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually or legally obligated under the RERA Act to facilitate subvention loans, and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order for a principal refund.
Tribunal Order #0901126023982021-09-03-2022
The Tribunal condoned a five-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually or legally obligated under the RERA Act to facilitate subvention loans, and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order for a principal refund. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually or legally obligated under the RERA Act to facilitate subvention loans, and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order for a principal refund.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ishan Khanna
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vinay Lakhani
- Saurabh Misra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the promoter was not contractually or legally obligated under the RERA Act to facilitate subvention loans, and upheld the Regulatory Authority's order for a principal refund.
The Tribunal condoned a five-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for wondrous buildmart private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.