Appellant / Complainant
Colorful Estate Private Limited
Respondent
Manoj Bhatnagar, Anita Bhatnagar
colorful estate private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126025302021 by Colorful Estate Private Limited against Manoj Bhatnagar, Anita Bhatnagar before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal modified the previous order to mandate that the promoter pay delay interest at the statutory rate of MCLR + 1% for the entire period from 13.02.2014 until possession was handed over on 21.10.2018, overriding any conflicting contractual terms.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has heard arguments from the counsels for all parties and has reserved the judgment, directing the parties to submit their written arguments.
Part Heard
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the counsel for the appellant was not interested in arguing the matter, and any existing interim orders were vacated.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on February 5, 2026.
For Order
The Tribunal directed respondent nos. 1/1 and 1/3 to file their objections within ten days and granted the appellant one week to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for 29.01.2026.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 19.12.2025, noting that the case is currently sub judice before the Hon'ble High Court and that counsel for other respondents sought an adjournment.
For Order
The Tribunal granted respondent No. 1/1 an additional 10 days to file objections and directed the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week of receiving them, scheduling the next hearing for 05.09.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and directed respondents No. 1/3 and No. 2 to file their objections by the next hearing on 11.08.2025, noting that failure to do so will result in ex parte proceedings.
Notice
The Tribunal granted time to respondent no. 1/3 to file objections and scheduled the case for orders on July 1, 2025, while allowing respondent no. 1/4 to file objections to the memo of appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a notice to proposed respondent Nos. 1/2 and 1/4 regarding an impleadment application, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 30.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for April 2, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued notices to proposed respondent Nos. 1/2 and 1/4 and outlined the procedural steps for service of notice and filing objections regarding the impleadment application.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for February 11, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant additional time to file an affidavit of service regarding notice to proposed respondents and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 20, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's substitution application, directed necessary amendments to the array of respondents, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.11.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the death of the respondent's legal representative and granted Ms. Manju Bhatnagar a final opportunity to argue her objections regarding the substitution of heirs. The matter is scheduled for orders or final hearing on 23.10.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a rejoinder to the objections and to comply with the previous order dated 21.05.2024, scheduling the next hearing for 16.08.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to submit a High Court order regarding the legal heirs of Satyawati Bhatnagar and scheduled the next hearing for July 18, 2024.
For Order
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal for hearing/orders to 21.05.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of both the appellant and the respondent's counsel and adjourned the matter to 19.04.2024 for hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed the applicant to reply within a week of receiving them, scheduling the next hearing for March 19, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders on 15.02.2024 due to the respondent's counsel being reported ill.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to issue fresh notices to the proposed legal representatives of the respondent regarding the substitution application, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 05.09.2023.
Notice
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 09.05.2023 for orders/hearing due to the respondent's counsel being out of station.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an application for substitution of heirs for respondent no. 1 and directed the issuance of notice to the proposed legal representatives, with the matter listed for hearing on 28.03.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file an application for the substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased respondent and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the substitution application, set aside the abatement order, and allowed the substitution of the deceased respondent's mother, Ms. Satyawati Bhatnagar, as the legal heir.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections regarding the abatement and substitution of the respondent's legal heirs, scheduling the matter for consideration on 31.10.2022.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
The Tribunal noted the respondent's submission regarding the filing of objections to the application for condonation of delay and setting aside of abatement, and scheduled the matter for further hearing on 10.10.2022.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
No text available.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
The Tribunal noted the appellant's intent to deposit Rs. 4,00,385/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and directed the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's application to set aside the order dated 26.11.2021.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal and imposed a cost of Rs. 3,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund, granting the appellant a final opportunity to comply with the Section 43(5) deposit requirement by the next hearing date.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to the appellant to comply with the provisions of Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, and rescheduled the matter to 13.07.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and adjourned the matter to 11.07.2022 for further orders.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a two-week extension to comply with the provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 04.07.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel to comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and rescheduled the hearing to 26.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to first comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act before proceeding with matters regarding the abatement of the suit against the deceased respondent.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) regarding mandatory deposits and ordered the Registry to locate and record applications for setting aside the abatement of the case due to the death of Respondent No. 1.
Further Order
The appeal against respondent Manoj Bhatnagar is abated due to the failure of the appellant to file a substitution application following the respondent's death. The court directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and listed the matter for further orders on 23.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objection and directed the appellant to serve the reply via email and upload it to the e-portal before the next hearing on 26.11.2021.
Notice
The Tribunal noted the death of respondent Manoj Bhatnagar and directed the appellant to file a substitution application to bring legal heirs on record.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file an application for substitution within the prescribed legal timeframe and to serve a copy to the appellant via email, adjourning the matter to 20.09.2021.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to appear in proper attire for the next hearing and ordered the filing of an application for substitution along with necessary documents.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) regarding the deposit of Rs. 8,90,615/-, directed the appellant to file a separate application for interim relief if desired, and scheduled the next hearing for 14.07.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-17-04-2026
The Tribunal modified the previous order to mandate that the promoter pay delay interest at the statutory rate of MCLR + 1% for the entire period from 13.02.2014 until possession was handed over on 21.10.2018, overriding any conflicting contractual terms.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-31-10-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the substitution application, set aside the abatement order, and allowed the substitution of the deceased respondent's mother, Ms. Satyawati Bhatnagar, as the legal heir.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-13-07-2022
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal and imposed a cost of Rs. 3,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund, granting the appellant a final opportunity to comply with the Section 43(5) deposit requirement by the next hearing date.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-23-12-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) regarding mandatory deposits and ordered the Registry to locate and record applications for setting aside the abatement of the case due to the death of Respondent No. 1.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-26-11-2021
The appeal against respondent Manoj Bhatnagar is abated due to the failure of the appellant to file a substitution application following the respondent's death. The court directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and listed the matter for further orders on 23.12.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-18-07-2022
The Tribunal noted the appellant's intent to deposit Rs. 4,00,385/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and directed the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's application to set aside the order dated 26.11.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126025302021-04-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to first comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act before proceeding with matters regarding the abatement of the suit against the deceased respondent.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal modified the previous order to mandate that the promoter pay delay interest at the statutory rate of MCLR + 1% for the entire period from 13.02.2014 until possession was handed over on 21.10.2018, overriding any conflicting contractual terms. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1 percent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal modified the previous order to mandate that the promoter pay delay interest at the statutory rate of MCLR + 1% for the entire period from 13.02.2014 until possession was handed over on 21.10.2018, overriding any conflicting contractual terms.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1 percent
Interest Period
from 13.02.2014 till the date of handing over possession of the unit i.e 21.10.2018
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
- Suchita Singh
- Raj Singh
- Parth Anand
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (7)
The Tribunal modified the previous order to mandate that the promoter pay delay interest at the statutory rate of MCLR + 1% for the entire period from 13.02.2014 until possession was handed over on 21.10.2018, overriding any conflicting contractual terms.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the substitution application, set aside the abatement order, and allowed the substitution of the deceased respondent's mother, Ms. Satyawati Bhatnagar, as the legal heir.
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal and imposed a cost of Rs. 3,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund, granting the appellant a final opportunity to comply with the Section 43(5) deposit requirement by the next hearing date.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) regarding mandatory deposits and ordered the Registry to locate and record applications for setting aside the abatement of the case due to the death of Respondent No. 1.
The appeal against respondent Manoj Bhatnagar is abated due to the failure of the appellant to file a substitution application following the respondent's death. The court directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and listed the matter for further orders on 23.12.2021.
The Tribunal noted the appellant's intent to deposit Rs. 4,00,385/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and directed the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's application to set aside the order dated 26.11.2021.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to first comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act before proceeding with matters regarding the abatement of the suit against the deceased respondent.
Need to research all rulings for colorful estate private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.