up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126026022022

Appellant / Complainant

Haryana Forests Limited

VS

Respondent

Jaiprakash Associates Limited

Developer Firm

jaiprakash associates limited

Disputed Amount

1,52,59,450

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126026022022 by Haryana Forests Limited against Jaiprakash Associates Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility Disputes
2
Stage 116/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Haryana Forests Limited, ruling that the allotted unit was part of the 'Golf Inventory' rather than a 'Golf Course view' apartment, thereby upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject claims for compensation and specification changes.

3
Stage 219/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to upload detailed information regarding annexures, including dates and page numbers, within one week and scheduled the next hearing for 16.08.2023.

4
Stage 305/05/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, noting that the actual delay was 4 days rather than 7, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

5
Stage 426/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to comply with a previous order regarding the explanation for delay in filing the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.05.2023.

6
Stage 517/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a supplementary affidavit explaining the delay in filing the appeal.

7
Stage 631/03/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.04.2023.

8
Stage 720/02/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to the senior counsel being out of station and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 31.03.2023.

9
Stage 818/01/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

10
Stage 913/12/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

11
Stage 1017/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged but not yet uploaded due to technical issues and scheduled the case for hearing on 13.12.2022 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

12
Stage 1112/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 17.11.2022.

13
Stage 1213/09/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for October 12, 2022.

14
Stage 1316/08/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to serve the appeal documents via speed post and email, scheduling the next hearing for 13.09.2022.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126026022022-16-08-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Haryana Forests Limited, ruling that the allotted unit was part of the 'Golf Inventory' rather than a 'Golf Course view' apartment, thereby upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject claims for compensation and specification changes.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126026022022-05-05-2023

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, noting that the actual delay was 4 days rather than 7, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Haryana Forests Limited, ruling that the allotted unit was part of the 'Golf Inventory' rather than a 'Golf Course view' apartment, thereby upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject claims for compensation and specification changes. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: 8.3% (SBI MCLR + 1%).

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: 8.3% (SBI MCLR + 1%)Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Haryana Forests Limited, ruling that the allotted unit was part of the 'Golf Inventory' rather than a 'Golf Course view' apartment, thereby upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject claims for compensation and specification changes.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

8.3% (SBI MCLR + 1%)

Interest Period

from September 2013 till the date when the respondent will offer possession of the Apartment to the Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 14(3)Section 12Section 11(4)(d)Section 19(6)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Mahima Pahwa

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Altaf Mansoor
  • Tanay Chaudhary

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126026022022-16-08-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Haryana Forests Limited, ruling that the allotted unit was part of the 'Golf Inventory' rather than a 'Golf Course view' apartment, thereby upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject claims for compensation and specification changes.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126026022022-05-05-2023

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, noting that the actual delay was 4 days rather than 7, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for jaiprakash associates limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →