Appellant / Complainant
Deepak Garg
Respondent
Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd.
gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd.
₹8,86,346
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126027512022 by Deepak Garg against Gardenia Aims Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the review petition, setting aside its previous observations regarding the invalidity of the 2018 demand letter and the preferential location charges (PLC), as these issues were beyond the scope of the original appeal.
Further Order
The Appellant challenged the legality of a specific demand dated 08.02.2018 and location charges of Rs. 75,000/-, requesting they be struck out; the Tribunal has reserved its judgment.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 21.10.2022 to allow the respondent's counsel to present case law regarding her authority to appear in the review petition.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 21.09.2022 to consider objections regarding a Review Petition filed against an original order.
For Order
The Tribunal issued a 'Dasti' notice to the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for further orders on 29.07.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal has ordered the review application to be listed before the concerned bench on 14.07.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126027512022-21-10-2022
The Appellant challenged the legality of a specific demand dated 08.02.2018 and location charges of Rs. 75,000/-, requesting they be struck out; the Tribunal has reserved its judgment.
Tribunal Order #0901126027512022-20-12-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the review petition, setting aside its previous observations regarding the invalidity of the 2018 demand letter and the preferential location charges (PLC), as these issues were beyond the scope of the original appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the review petition, setting aside its previous observations regarding the invalidity of the 2018 demand letter and the preferential location charges (PLC), as these issues were beyond the scope of the original appeal. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the review petition, setting aside its previous observations regarding the invalidity of the 2018 demand letter and the preferential location charges (PLC), as these issues were beyond the scope of the original appeal.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% per annum
Interest Period
from 1st November 2012 till the date of handing over 'fit out possession' (December 2016)
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- | | Counsel for Respondent |
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Counsel for Appellant | |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellant challenged the legality of a specific demand dated 08.02.2018 and location charges of Rs. 75,000/-, requesting they be struck out; the Tribunal has reserved its judgment.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the review petition, setting aside its previous observations regarding the invalidity of the 2018 demand letter and the preferential location charges (PLC), as these issues were beyond the scope of the original appeal.
Need to research all rulings for gardenia aims developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.