up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126028442023

Appellant / Complainant

Samiah International Builders Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Sameer Kumar

Developer Firm

samiah international builders pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

12,70,589

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126028442023 by Samiah International Builders Pvt. Ltd. against Sameer Kumar before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 119/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession for an allottee staying in a project; instead, such authority lies with the Regulatory Authority.

3
Stage 214/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

No text available.

4
Stage 329/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay and the appeal itself, subsequently reserving the judgment for future delivery.

5
Stage 431/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29.07.2024.

6
Stage 530/04/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 628/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant for filing a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the hearing for the application for condonation of delay to 30.04.2024.

8
Stage 723/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay to 28.03.2024.

9
Stage 816/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on 23.02.2024.

10
Stage 912/10/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

11
Stage 1004/09/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 12.10.2023.

12
Stage 1113/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to comply with service requirements following a deposit made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126028442023-19-11-2024

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession for an allottee staying in a project; instead, such authority lies with the Regulatory Authority.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126028442023-13-07-2023

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to comply with service requirements following a deposit made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession for an allottee staying in a project; instead, such authority lies with the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession for an allottee staying in a project; instead, such authority lies with the Regulatory Authority.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Krishna Kumar Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Mishra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126028442023-19-11-2024

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to grant interest as compensation for delay in possession for an allottee staying in a project; instead, such authority lies with the Regulatory Authority.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126028442023-13-07-2023

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to comply with service requirements following a deposit made under Section 43(5) of the Act.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for samiah international builders pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →