Appellant / Complainant
Vineeta Singh, Mukesh Kumar
Respondent
Apex Heights Private Limited
apex heights private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126033192022 by Vineeta Singh, Mukesh Kumar against Apex Heights Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Vineeta Singh due to non-prosecution and failure to appear or file replies for consecutive hearings.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for orders on 27.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and scheduled it for a subsequent hearing on 29.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 29.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to medical exigency and directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within two weeks.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, noting that failure to do so will result in the forfeiture of their right to reply.
Hearing
Upon a joint request from the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for hearing on 28.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel being out of station but closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to previous non-compliance with time limits.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.07.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on 24.04.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on February 3, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal after finding it was filed within time and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel and scheduled the matter for 22.11.2022 to address the delay condonation application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders or hearing on October 31, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal found service of notice on the respondent sufficient and granted a 10-day extension for filing objections, with the next hearing scheduled for September 28, 2022.
Notice
The Tribunal deemed the service of notice to the respondent sufficient via post and email and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and provided specific procedural instructions for the service of the appeal memo via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126033192022-27-08-2024
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Vineeta Singh due to non-prosecution and failure to appear or file replies for consecutive hearings.
Tribunal Order #0901126033192022-22-11-2022
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal after finding it was filed within time and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126033192022-04-07-2023
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel being out of station but closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to previous non-compliance with time limits.
Tribunal Order #0901126033192022-02-08-2022
The Tribunal deemed the service of notice to the respondent sufficient via post and email and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Vineeta Singh due to non-prosecution and failure to appear or file replies for consecutive hearings. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Vineeta Singh due to non-prosecution and failure to appear or file replies for consecutive hearings.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajnish Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Vineeta Singh due to non-prosecution and failure to appear or file replies for consecutive hearings.
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal after finding it was filed within time and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel being out of station but closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to previous non-compliance with time limits.
The Tribunal deemed the service of notice to the respondent sufficient via post and email and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Need to research all rulings for apex heights private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.