Appellant / Complainant
Abhishek Rathore
Respondent
Gardenia Aims Developers Private Limited
gardenia aims developers private limited
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126038602021 by Abhishek Rathore against Gardenia Aims Developers Private Limited before up_rera.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the appellant's complaint regarding super area disputes and restored the complaint to its original file for a fresh decision on the merits.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of Appeal-691/2021 as arguments were not concluded and has scheduled the matter for further hearing on 10.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity for adjournment to the respondent due to non-cooperation, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 11.12.2024 and directed the respondent to submit calculations regarding whether the super area was reduced following subsequent layout or DPR amendments.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 11, 2024, at the request of the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal reasons and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 30.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within three days and provided a subsequent hearing date of 06.09.2024.
Hearing
Upon a joint request from the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for hearing on 06.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 04.07.2024 for hearing due to the medical unavailability of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 07.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal family difficulties and rescheduled the hearing for April 9, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for a hearing on 07.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 21.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from both parties for an adjournment and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 11.10.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal reasons and rescheduled the hearing for August 25, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders on 07.07.2023.
For Order
The court granted a joint request from the counsels for both parties to adjourn the matter, rescheduling the case for further orders on 05.01.2023.
Further Order
Upon a joint request from the counsels for both parties, the tribunal adjourned the appeal to be listed on 01.12.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels for both parties to adjourn the matter, rescheduling the appeal for further orders on 09.11.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted a request from both parties to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the hearing for October 10, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments before the next hearing scheduled for 28.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for August 26, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a reply against the memo of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for August 3, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply against the grounds of appeal and directed that a copy be sent to the appellant via email, adjourning the matter to 26.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay by 120 days, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and directed the registry to register the appeal as regular.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama, objections against the limitation application, and grounds of appeal within two weeks, with a follow-up hearing scheduled for 21.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post, e-mail, and Dasti, and scheduled the case for 24.12.2021 to address the limitation application and any objections.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent via registered post and e-mail.
Tribunal Order #0901126038602021-10-02-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the appellant's complaint regarding super area disputes and restored the complaint to its original file for a fresh decision on the merits.
Tribunal Order #0901126038602021-11-12-2024
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity for adjournment to the respondent due to non-cooperation, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable to the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126038602021-11-11-2024
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 11.12.2024 and directed the respondent to submit calculations regarding whether the super area was reduced following subsequent layout or DPR amendments.
Tribunal Order #0901126038602021-04-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay by 120 days, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and directed the registry to register the appeal as regular.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the appellant's complaint regarding super area disputes and restored the complaint to its original file for a fresh decision on the merits. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the appellant's complaint regarding super area disputes and restored the complaint to its original file for a fresh decision on the merits.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the appellant's complaint regarding super area disputes and restored the complaint to its original file for a fresh decision on the merits.
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity for adjournment to the respondent due to non-cooperation, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable to the appellant.
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 11.12.2024 and directed the respondent to submit calculations regarding whether the super area was reduced following subsequent layout or DPR amendments.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay by 120 days, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and directed the registry to register the appeal as regular.
Need to research all rulings for gardenia aims developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.