Appellant / Complainant
Fusion Buildtech Private Limited
Respondent
Renu Massey
fusion buildtech private limited
₹9,09,678
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043792024 by Fusion Buildtech Private Limited against Renu Massey before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and rescheduled the appeal to be heard on 29.05.2026 due to the unavailability of the respondent's counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.05.2026.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent time to file objections to the computation certificate and the Miscellaneous Application, and scheduled the matter for orders on 10.04.2026.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 16.03.2026.
For Order
The Tribunal scheduled the case for orders on 11.02.2026 and explicitly noted that no further adjournments will be granted to either party.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the respondent's objections and High Court judgment have been served, and due to the appellant's counsel's unavailability for medical reasons, the matter is adjourned to 28.01.2026.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and a subsequent week for the appellant to file a rejoinder, with the next hearing scheduled for 18.12.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and a subsequent week for a rejoinder, following an adjournment requested by the appellant, and scheduled the next hearing for 25.11.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for possession of the unit, ruling that the respondent's claim was stale due to excessive delay, but directed the appellant promoter to refund the deposited amount with interest to the respondents.
Admission
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 27.05.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and scheduled the matter for hearing on 14.05.2025, noting that the case may proceed ex parte if the appellant fails to appear.
Admission
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 25.04.2025 to allow the respondent to address the question of maintainability, noting that no further adjournments will be granted and the case may proceed ex parte if the respondent fails to appear.
Admission
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for order/hearing on 27.03.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 4, 2025.
Admission
The proceedings for Appeal-436/2024 were adjourned due to an application by the appellant's counsel, with the next hearing scheduled for February 6, 2025.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural timeline for service of notice, filing of objections to the condonation of delay, and subsequent replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126043792024-27-05-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for possession of the unit, ruling that the respondent's claim was stale due to excessive delay, but directed the appellant promoter to refund the deposited amount with interest to the respondents.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for possession of the unit, ruling that the respondent's claim was stale due to excessive delay, but directed the appellant promoter to refund the deposited amount with interest to the respondents. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for possession of the unit, ruling that the respondent's claim was stale due to excessive delay, but directed the appellant promoter to refund the deposited amount with interest to the respondents.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
till the date of compliance of Section 43 (5) of Act, 2016
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Aahuti Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for possession of the unit, ruling that the respondent's claim was stale due to excessive delay, but directed the appellant promoter to refund the deposited amount with interest to the respondents.
Need to research all rulings for fusion buildtech private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.