Appellant / Complainant
Fragrance Dream Homes Pvt Ltd
Respondent
Soni Srivastava
fragrance dream homes pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126044982024 by Fragrance Dream Homes Pvt Ltd against Soni Srivastava before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the promoter's deposited amount be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement to the respondent.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for hearing on 18.08.2025 to consider an application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder against the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 23.07.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to issue notice to the respondent following a technical failure in generating the notice, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 02.07.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the application for condonation of delay and memo of appeal via speed-post and email, scheduling the matter for hearing on 20.05.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 7-day extension to deposit the required amount due to technical glitches and scheduled the next hearing for 23.04.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and the failure to deliver possession of the unit, granting the appellant three weeks to rectify these compliance issues.
Tribunal Order #0901126044982024-18-08-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the promoter's deposited amount be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126044982024-17-03-2025
The Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and the failure to deliver possession of the unit, granting the appellant three weeks to rectify these compliance issues.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the promoter's deposited amount be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement to the respondent. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the promoter's deposited amount be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement to the respondent.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajan Mishra
- Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sudhir Kumar Shrivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the promoter's deposited amount be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement to the respondent.
The Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and the failure to deliver possession of the unit, granting the appellant three weeks to rectify these compliance issues.
Need to research all rulings for fragrance dream homes pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.