Appellant / Complainant
Bal Mukund Sharma
Respondent
Ajpa Parishad Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd
ajpa parishad sehkari awas samiti ltd
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126052792022 by Bal Mukund Sharma against Ajpa Parishad Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the impugned order by enhancing compensation for lack of promised amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's refusal to accept the notice, deemed service sufficient, heard the appellant, and reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the order passed in a related appeal (Ravi Pratap Sharma Vs. AJPA Parishad Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.) be applied and scheduled the current appeal for hearing on 12.12.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the matter for orders on 18.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the order passed in a related appeal (Appeal No. 668/2022) be applied and scheduled this appeal for a hearing on 03.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a seven-day extension to comply with the order dated 08.08.2024 and scheduled the next hearing for 02.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to identify current office bearers due to a dissolved committee and granted the appellant one week to provide details of the respondent's office bearers. The matter is listed for further orders/hearing on 21.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order previously passed in Appeal No. 668/2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal refers the matter to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 80/2023 for directions.
Further Hearing
Due to the respondent's failure to comply with the order dated 15.04.2024, the Tribunal has summoned the President and Secretary of the respondent to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them under Section 64 of the Act, 2016.
Hearing
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the orders previously passed in Appeal No. 669/2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 669/2022 for the relevant directions.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of the appeal to 21.03.2024 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 669/2022 for the relevant directions.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's counsel was on sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 16.02.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for lawyers to abstain from judicial work, rescheduling the hearing for 13.10.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and scheduled the appeal for a subsequent hearing on 05.09.2023 due to the illness of the respondent's counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a reply to the appellant's supplementary affidavit and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and, upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, adjourned the matter to be listed for hearing on 12.04.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for March 1, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the submission of a soft copy via email and upload to the e-portal, with the matter listed for hearing on 31.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed that this appeal be listed on 21.12.2022 along with Appeal No. 680/2022, following the order passed on 25.11.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the appeal, while issuing a warning regarding their failure to comply with previous procedural timelines.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural timeline for service of notice, filing of objections, and subsequent replies before the next hearing on 20.10.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126052792022-14-05-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the impugned order by enhancing compensation for lack of promised amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Tribunal Order #0901126052792022-07-05-2024
Due to the respondent's failure to comply with the order dated 15.04.2024, the Tribunal has summoned the President and Secretary of the respondent to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them under Section 64 of the Act, 2016.
Tribunal Order #0901126052792022-08-08-2024
The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to identify current office bearers due to a dissolved committee and granted the appellant one week to provide details of the respondent's office bearers. The matter is listed for further orders/hearing on 21.08.2024.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the impugned order by enhancing compensation for lack of promised amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the impugned order by enhancing compensation for lack of promised amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the impugned order by enhancing compensation for lack of promised amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Due to the respondent's failure to comply with the order dated 15.04.2024, the Tribunal has summoned the President and Secretary of the respondent to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them under Section 64 of the Act, 2016.
The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to identify current office bearers due to a dissolved committee and granted the appellant one week to provide details of the respondent's office bearers. The matter is listed for further orders/hearing on 21.08.2024.
Need to research all rulings for ajpa parishad sehkari awas samiti ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.