Appellant / Complainant
Rajni Gupta
Respondent
Gayatri Hospitality And Real Con Limited
gayatri hospitality and real con limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126053652021 by Rajni Gupta against Gayatri Hospitality And Real Con Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal filed by Rajni Gupta was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or her counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant due to their inability to travel and rescheduled the hearing for 21.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a mutual request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the hearing for February 1, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel via email and directed that future adjournment requests must be uploaded through the official e-portal folder.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 04.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request from both parties, adjourned the matter for a hearing scheduled on 23.03.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a three-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that the reply be shared via email and uploaded to the e-portal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to a bereavement in the counsel's family and scheduled the matter for orders on 16.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was incorrectly listed for today's date and directed that it be listed for its originally scheduled hearing on 11.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the respondent to pay half of the previously imposed Rs. 1,000 cost to the appellant in cash and deposit the remainder into the Tribunal fund.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply against the memo of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- to be split between the appellant and the Tribunal fund.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and adjourned the matter to 11.08.2022 following an adjournment application by the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned the 58-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the respondent to file a reply against the grounds of appeal.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide copies of the limitation application and memo of appeal to the respondent, and ordered the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and objection by the next hearing on 26.04.2022.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal granted an application for adjournment and rescheduled the case to 02.02.2022.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed beyond the prescribed time limit and directed that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email, with the matter listed for further orders on 07.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126053652021-21-02-2024
The appeal filed by Rajni Gupta was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or her counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126053652021-26-04-2022
The Tribunal condoned the 58-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the respondent to file a reply against the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126053652021-12-09-2022
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the respondent to pay half of the previously imposed Rs. 1,000 cost to the appellant in cash and deposit the remainder into the Tribunal fund.
Tribunal Order #0901126053652021-11-08-2022
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply against the memo of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- to be split between the appellant and the Tribunal fund.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal filed by Rajni Gupta was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or her counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal filed by Rajni Gupta was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or her counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Mohsin Khan
- Nikhil Fernandis
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Nandwani
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The appeal filed by Rajni Gupta was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or her counsel.
The Tribunal condoned the 58-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the respondent to file a reply against the grounds of appeal.
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the respondent to pay half of the previously imposed Rs. 1,000 cost to the appellant in cash and deposit the remainder into the Tribunal fund.
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply against the memo of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- to be split between the appellant and the Tribunal fund.
Need to research all rulings for gayatri hospitality and real con limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.