Appellant / Complainant
Jaideep Singh
Respondent
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd.
ansal properties & infrastructure ltd.
₹4,78,500
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000802019 by Jaideep Singh against Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for a refund, ruling that it exceeded the appellant's prayers; instead, the Tribunal directed the respondent to provide possession of the booked plot along with interest at MCLR+1% from three years after the agreement date until actual possession.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to amend their prayer clause regarding interest rates and reserved judgment following arguments concerning a dispute over possession versus refund of consideration.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a two-week adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel to file a supplementary affidavit and potential amendments, scheduling the next hearing for 22.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the substitution of legal heirs for the deceased appellant and granted a three-day extension to incorporate previous amendments into the case record.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed a substitution application to replace the deceased appellant, Jaideep Singh, with his wife, Mrs. Shivangi Singh, in the memo of appeal.
Hearing
The appeal is adjourned due to a Bar Association call, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 19.03.2021.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 04.03.2021 following an adjournment request by the appellant's counsel and a submission regarding the substitution of the deceased appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126000802019-19-03-2021
The Tribunal allowed a substitution application to replace the deceased appellant, Jaideep Singh, with his wife, Mrs. Shivangi Singh, in the memo of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126000802019-21-03-2022
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for a refund, ruling that it exceeded the appellant's prayers; instead, the Tribunal directed the respondent to provide possession of the booked plot along with interest at MCLR+1% from three years after the agreement date until actual possession.
Tribunal Order #0901126000802019-20-11-2021
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to amend their prayer clause regarding interest rates and reserved judgment following arguments concerning a dispute over possession versus refund of consideration.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for a refund, ruling that it exceeded the appellant's prayers; instead, the Tribunal directed the respondent to provide possession of the booked plot along with interest at MCLR+1% from three years after the agreement date until actual possession. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for a refund, ruling that it exceeded the appellant's prayers; instead, the Tribunal directed the respondent to provide possession of the booked plot along with interest at MCLR+1% from three years after the agreement date until actual possession.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% per annum
Interest Period
after expiry of three years from the date of Plot Buyer's Agreement dated 22.01.2007 till the date of actual possession of the plot
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
- Surangama Sharma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed a substitution application to replace the deceased appellant, Jaideep Singh, with his wife, Mrs. Shivangi Singh, in the memo of appeal.
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for a refund, ruling that it exceeded the appellant's prayers; instead, the Tribunal directed the respondent to provide possession of the booked plot along with interest at MCLR+1% from three years after the agreement date until actual possession.
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to amend their prayer clause regarding interest rates and reserved judgment following arguments concerning a dispute over possession versus refund of consideration.
Need to research all rulings for ansal properties & infrastructure ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.