Appellant / Complainant
Suman Singh
Respondent
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd.
ansal properties & infrastructure ltd.
₹1,10,18,609
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009272020 by Suman Singh against Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Suman Singh, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject her claim for compensation due to a lack of documentary evidence proving actual losses suffered.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the appellant's challenge to a previous order and subsequently reserved judgment.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections to the appeal, warning that failure to comply will result in the matter proceeding ex parte.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to place the case file before the Hon'ble Chairman for appropriate orders due to a similar previously decided matter and scheduled the next hearing for 08.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The court noted the absence of the appellant and directed the registry to present the case before the Hon'ble Chairman for reassignment to Bench No. I, with the next hearing scheduled for 25.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal ordered the transfer of Appeal-496/2020 to Bench No. 1 for final hearing on 22.04.2022, noting that a similar issue had been previously decided by that Bench.
For Order
This is a procedural entry noting the presence of counsel for both the appellant and respondent during the court call.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for April 4, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the matter to 10.01.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the case to 21.12.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application and objections.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and established a timeline for exchanging objections and replies via email before the next hearing on 24.11.2021.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 01.11.2021 following a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel on health grounds.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the case for hearing on 05.10.2021 regarding the application for condonation of delay, while also directing the Registry to record Shri Anurag Singh as counsel for the respondent.
For Order
The case is adjourned to 01.04.2021 due to a lawyer strike by the Oudh Bar Association, with a directive for parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the appellant's counsel due to his wife's illness and rescheduled the case for 05.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objection and directed the registration of co-counsel Sri Mohd. Ateeq Khan. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on 12.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126009272020-27-09-2022
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Suman Singh, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject her claim for compensation due to a lack of documentary evidence proving actual losses suffered.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Suman Singh, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject her claim for compensation due to a lack of documentary evidence proving actual losses suffered. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Suman Singh, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject her claim for compensation due to a lack of documentary evidence proving actual losses suffered.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Vineet Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Suman Singh, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's decision to reject her claim for compensation due to a lack of documentary evidence proving actual losses suffered.
Need to research all rulings for ansal properties & infrastructure ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.