Appellant / Complainant
Ifci Infrastructure Development Limited
Respondent
Sumit Gupata
ifci infrastructure development limited
₹28,08,990
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003132019 by Ifci Infrastructure Development Limited against Sumit Gupata before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed both cross-appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order for compensation due to delay and directing the promoter to examine the refund of Preferential Location Charges (PLC) if the flat's status as a preferential location has been lost.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding specific grounds of the appeal and has reserved its judgment for a later date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding a two-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 27.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for April 13, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment, listing the case for 01.04.2022 alongside Misc. Case No. 100/2020 and directed parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence and rescheduled the hearing for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 21.03.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application requested by the counsel for the appellant and rescheduled the case for 11.01.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for 22.12.2021 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case to be heard alongside Misc. Case No. 100/2020 on 17.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to personal difficulty faced by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the case for 29.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 15.04.2021 for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing, following a joint request from both counsels.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay and related matters to 10.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for 23.02.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant but imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 to be used for the Legal Representative's Library, while explicitly stating that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next date.
Tribunal Order #0901126003132019-30-06-2022
The Tribunal dismissed both cross-appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order for compensation due to delay and directing the promoter to examine the refund of Preferential Location Charges (PLC) if the flat's status as a preferential location has been lost.
Tribunal Order #0901126003132019-28-01-2021
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant but imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 to be used for the Legal Representative's Library, while explicitly stating that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next date.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed both cross-appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order for compensation due to delay and directing the promoter to examine the refund of Preferential Location Charges (PLC) if the flat's status as a preferential location has been lost. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed both cross-appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order for compensation due to delay and directing the promoter to examine the refund of Preferential Location Charges (PLC) if the flat's status as a preferential location has been lost.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
after 45 days till actual payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anurag Arora
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Waseeq Uddin Ahmed
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed both cross-appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order for compensation due to delay and directing the promoter to examine the refund of Preferential Location Charges (PLC) if the flat's status as a preferential location has been lost.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant but imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 to be used for the Legal Representative's Library, while explicitly stating that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next date.
Need to research all rulings for ifci infrastructure development limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.