Appellant / Complainant
Ifci Infrastructure Development Limited Ifci Tower
Respondent
Preeti Sharda
ifci infrastructure development limited
₹33,27,773
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010462020 by Ifci Infrastructure Development Limited Ifci Tower against Preeti Sharda before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the previous order for want of jurisdiction but, based on admitted facts, directed the appellant promoter to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% on the deposited amount from 01.04.2013 to 28.12.2017, along with Rs. 25,000 in litigation costs.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a supplementary affidavit addressing specific construction and project timeline details and scheduled the next hearing for August 1, 2025.
Notice
The appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel to press the matter.
For Order
The Tribunal issued notices to the parties and scheduled the appeal for the next hearing on 17.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer and the legality of delay interest, subsequently reserving the judgment for future pronouncement.
Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 19.09.2024 and noted that the respondent was absent, providing them a final opportunity to argue.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to argue the matter and scheduled the next hearing for 12.09.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 06.09.2024 due to the absence of both parties and technical glitches with the portal.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to prepare their brief and rescheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 21.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent on personal grounds and scheduled the interest appeal for hearing on 08.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file an application regarding the respondent's intent not to contest the execution case and scheduled the matter for hearing on 09.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal to include a new ground regarding the lack of jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer. The parties were directed to exchange the amended memo and subsequent objections within specified timelines.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an amendment application to incorporate grounds challenging the Adjudicating Officer's order and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings at the request of the respondent's counsel to allow time for brief preparation and rescheduled the hearing for 05.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to the unavailability of complete records and scheduled the next hearing for 19.02.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, rescheduling the hearing to 17.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 11.09.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel but cautioned that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next hearing date, which is scheduled for 21.08.2023.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent for a hearing scheduled on 10.04.2023 and directed the applicant to serve the notice and appeal documents via email and speed-post.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel and noted the respondent's health condition, subsequently reserving the judgment for future pronouncement.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 22.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to email their reply to the appellant and permitted the appellant to file a rejoinder, while ordering both parties to upload documents to the e-portal and file originals in the Registry before the next hearing on 29.04.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal via email and the e-portal, adjourning the matter to 02.03.2021.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 12.02.2021 for further hearing, noting the respondent's absence and the appellant's counsel's submission that a settlement is likely.
Tribunal Order #0901126010462020-01-08-2025
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the previous order for want of jurisdiction but, based on admitted facts, directed the appellant promoter to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% on the deposited amount from 01.04.2013 to 28.12.2017, along with Rs. 25,000 in litigation costs.
Tribunal Order #0901126010462020-10-04-2023
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126010462020-17-02-2025
The appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel to press the matter.
Tribunal Order #0901126010462020-29-03-2024
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal to include a new ground regarding the lack of jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer. The parties were directed to exchange the amended memo and subsequent objections within specified timelines.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the previous order for want of jurisdiction but, based on admitted facts, directed the appellant promoter to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% on the deposited amount from 01.04.2013 to 28.12.2017, along with Rs. 25,000 in litigation costs. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel. The appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel to press the matter. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the previous order for want of jurisdiction but, based on admitted facts, directed the appellant promoter to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% on the deposited amount from 01.04.2013 to 28.12.2017, along with Rs. 25,000 in litigation costs. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel. The appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel to press the matter.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
w.e.f. 01.04.2013 till 28.12.2017
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Vikram Asthana
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Appellate Tribunal quashed the previous order for want of jurisdiction but, based on admitted facts, directed the appellant promoter to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% on the deposited amount from 01.04.2013 to 28.12.2017, along with Rs. 25,000 in litigation costs.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
The appeal filed by IFCI Infrastructure Development Limited was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel to press the matter.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal to include a new ground regarding the lack of jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer. The parties were directed to exchange the amended memo and subsequent objections within specified timelines.
Need to research all rulings for ifci infrastructure development limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.