Appellant / Complainant
Anand Prakash Suman
Respondent
Habitech Infrastructure Limited
habitech infrastructure limited
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126008222021 by Anand Prakash Suman against Habitech Infrastructure Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to hand over possession of the allotted flat to the appellant within 15 days and permitted the payment of car parking charges in 24 equal monthly installments.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to email their reply to the appellant and ordered the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing on 05.08.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within three days and scheduled the matter for further orders on 13.06.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply regarding the appeal and clarify the demand for parking charges, while ordering both parties to exchange payment details by the next hearing on 30.05.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and instructed the respondent to appear at the next hearing with a settlement proposal regarding the delivery of possession of the flat.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 37-day delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant's health issues and COVID-19 circumstances, converted the defective appeal into a regular one, and issued notice to the respondent.
Notice
The Tribunal, noting that the respondent failed to appear despite notice publication in 'Dainik Jagran', decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent and listed the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay application.
Notice
The Tribunal noted that notice had not been duly served on the respondent and ordered that notice be published in a widely circulated daily newspaper. The case is scheduled for further orders on 12.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to issue 'Dasti' notice to the respondent and file an affidavit of service by the next hearing date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to collect Dasti notice to ensure proper service upon the respondent and file an affidavit of service by the next hearing date.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent and outlined a procedural timeline for filing objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange documents via email before the next hearing on 23.04.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify if defects in the appeal have been removed and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 26.03.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify procedural defects in the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126008222021-05-08-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to hand over possession of the allotted flat to the appellant within 15 days and permitted the payment of car parking charges in 24 equal monthly installments.
Tribunal Order #0901126008222021-16-03-2022
The Tribunal condoned a 37-day delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant's health issues and COVID-19 circumstances, converted the defective appeal into a regular one, and issued notice to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126008222021-11-05-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply regarding the appeal and clarify the demand for parking charges, while ordering both parties to exchange payment details by the next hearing on 30.05.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126008222021-07-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and instructed the respondent to appear at the next hearing with a settlement proposal regarding the delivery of possession of the flat.
Tribunal Order #0901126008222021-22-02-2022
The Tribunal, noting that the respondent failed to appear despite notice publication in 'Dainik Jagran', decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent and listed the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay application.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal directed the respondent to hand over possession of the allotted flat to the appellant within 15 days and permitted the payment of car parking charges in 24 equal monthly installments. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal directed the respondent to hand over possession of the allotted flat to the appellant within 15 days and permitted the payment of car parking charges in 24 equal monthly installments.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Gopal Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Suchita Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal directed the respondent to hand over possession of the allotted flat to the appellant within 15 days and permitted the payment of car parking charges in 24 equal monthly installments.
The Tribunal condoned a 37-day delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant's health issues and COVID-19 circumstances, converted the defective appeal into a regular one, and issued notice to the respondent.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply regarding the appeal and clarify the demand for parking charges, while ordering both parties to exchange payment details by the next hearing on 30.05.2022.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and instructed the respondent to appear at the next hearing with a settlement proposal regarding the delivery of possession of the flat.
The Tribunal, noting that the respondent failed to appear despite notice publication in 'Dainik Jagran', decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent and listed the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay application.
Need to research all rulings for habitech infrastructure limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.