up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126043592024

Appellant / Complainant

Chander Prakash

VS

Respondent

Habitech Infrastructure Limited, Crc Homes Pvt Ltd

Developer Firm

habitech infrastructure limited

Disputed Amount

37,27,407

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Structural Defects & QualityPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

11 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043592024 by Chander Prakash against Habitech Infrastructure Limited, Crc Homes Pvt Ltd before up_rera.

Structural Defects & QualityPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 113/10/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the Regulatory Authority's dismissal of their complaints was not illegal and clarifying that claims regarding deviations from sanctioned plans or compensation must be brought before the Adjudicating Officer rather than the Regulatory Authority.

3
Stage 211/07/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsels for the appellant and respondents regarding the appeal, but has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 309/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted both parties 15 days to file additional documents and scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 11.07.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.

5
Stage 407/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, excusing a 55-day delay in filing the appeal, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

6
Stage 527/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 07.04.2025 for orders/hearing and directed parties to complete their pleadings in the interim.

7
Stage 606/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 27, 2025.

8
Stage 703/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and application for condonation of delay, directing the applicant to serve the respondent via speed-post and email and setting a hearing date for 06.02.2025.

9
Stage 8Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126043592024-07-04-2025

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, excusing a 55-day delay in filing the appeal, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

10
Stage 9Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126043592024-13-10-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the Regulatory Authority's dismissal of their complaints was not illegal and clarifying that claims regarding deviations from sanctioned plans or compensation must be brought before the Adjudicating Officer rather than the Regulatory Authority.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the Regulatory Authority's dismissal of their complaints was not illegal and clarifying that claims regarding deviations from sanctioned plans or compensation must be brought before the Adjudicating Officer rather than the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the Regulatory Authority's dismissal of their complaints was not illegal and clarifying that claims regarding deviations from sanctioned plans or compensation must be brought before the Adjudicating Officer rather than the Regulatory Authority.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 14(3)Section 12Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Syed Nasir Abbas Hasani

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Ashish Chaturvedi
  • Dinkar Tiwari
  • Fauzan Khwaja

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126043592024-07-04-2025

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, excusing a 55-day delay in filing the appeal, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126043592024-13-10-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by allottees, ruling that the Regulatory Authority's dismissal of their complaints was not illegal and clarifying that claims regarding deviations from sanctioned plans or compensation must be brought before the Adjudicating Officer rather than the Regulatory Authority.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for habitech infrastructure limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →