up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126015552025

Appellant / Complainant

Floral Realcon Pvt Ltd

VS

Respondent

Subhrakant Sahoo

Developer Firm

floral realcon pvt ltd

Disputed Amount

2,25,989

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

16 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015552025 by Floral Realcon Pvt Ltd against Subhrakant Sahoo before up_rera.

2
Stage 105/02/2026

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's request to restore a dismissed appeal, ruling that since the original dismissal was due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) of the Act, the appeal cannot be restored and the appellant must file a fresh appeal.

3
Stage 215/01/2026

Hearing on Recall App

No text available.

4
Stage 314/01/2026

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal noted that notice had been sufficiently served upon the respondent and scheduled the matter for 05.02.2026 to consider the delay condonation and recall applications.

5
Stage 405/12/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application (RA-68/2025) and directed the applicant to serve the notice and application via post and email, with subsequent timelines set for filing objections and replies.

6
Stage 520/11/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The court noted the absence of both parties and adjourned the matter to 05.12.2025 for orders.

7
Stage 630/10/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and adjourned the matter to 20.11.2025 for orders.

8
Stage 725/09/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal granted a request to reschedule the hearing of RA-68/2025 and listed the matter for 30.10.2025.

9
Stage 815/09/2025

Hearing on Recall App

No text available.

10
Stage 929/08/2025

Hearing on Recall App

Upon the request of the appellant's counsel, the Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the case for orders on 15.09.2025.

11
Stage 1012/08/2025

Hearing on Recall App

Upon the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 29.08.2025.

12
Stage 1109/07/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal has scheduled the recall application for hearing on 12.08.2025.

13
Stage 1215/05/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal granted a request from the parties to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 09.07.2025.

14
Stage 1308/05/2025

Hearing on Recall App

The Tribunal has directed the counsel for the appellant to address the maintainability of the recall application and has scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing on 15.05.2025.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015552025-05-02-2026

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's request to restore a dismissed appeal, ruling that since the original dismissal was due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) of the Act, the appeal cannot be restored and the appellant must file a fresh appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's request to restore a dismissed appeal, ruling that since the original dismissal was due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) of the Act, the appeal cannot be restored and the appellant must file a fresh appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's request to restore a dismissed appeal, ruling that since the original dismissal was due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) of the Act, the appeal cannot be restored and the appellant must file a fresh appeal.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 43(5)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015552025-05-02-2026

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's request to restore a dismissed appeal, ruling that since the original dismissal was due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) of the Act, the appeal cannot be restored and the appellant must file a fresh appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for floral realcon pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →