up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126018952023

Appellant / Complainant

Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd

VS

Respondent

Priyanka Sharma

Developer Firm

himalaya realestate pvt ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

23 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126018952023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt Ltd against Priyanka Sharma before up_rera.

2
Stage 116/04/2025

Delay condonation

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

3
Stage 219/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has granted a request to list the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 16.04.2025.

4
Stage 318/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.

5
Stage 424/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-486/2023 to 18.02.2025 before the regular Bench at the request of the parties.

6
Stage 502/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.

7
Stage 605/11/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 723/09/2024

Delay condonation

The respondent stated she is not pressing for the execution of any Recovery Certificate (R.C.) against the appellant, and the parties requested to list the appeal for hearing on 05.11.2024.

9
Stage 820/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 regarding the current matter.

10
Stage 926/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 20, 2024.

11
Stage 1029/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the relevant directions.

12
Stage 1123/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for the consideration of a condonation of delay application and a subsequent hearing on 29.05.2024.

13
Stage 1222/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.

14
Stage 1318/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order previously passed in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the relevant directions.

15
Stage 1415/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.03.2024.

16
Stage 1518/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 15.02.2024.

17
Stage 1616/10/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

18
Stage 1706/09/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh resolution calling for a three-day lawyer strike and rescheduled the hearing for 16.10.2023.

19
Stage 1814/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 1,91,720/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for hearing on 06.09.2023.

20
Stage 19Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018952023-16-04-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018952023-02-01-2025

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126018952023-14-07-2023

The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 1,91,720/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for hearing on 06.09.2023.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Nilaya Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Awanitika

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018952023-16-04-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the negligence of the appellant's legal representative did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse the delay.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018952023-02-01-2025

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion and handing over of possession of the respective units.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126018952023-14-07-2023

The Tribunal verified the appellant's deposit of Rs. 1,91,720/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for hearing on 06.09.2023.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →