up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126021542021

Appellant / Complainant

Tripta Chugh

VS

Respondent

Parsvnath Developers Limited

Developer Firm

parsvnath developers limited

Disputed Amount

5,50,000

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

33 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021542021 by Tripta Chugh against Parsvnath Developers Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 120/01/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant because the real estate project was not registered with RERA, making the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

3
Stage 216/12/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal for further hearing and directed the Registry to constitute the Bench for the next scheduled date on 20.01.2025.

4
Stage 328/11/2024

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 423/10/2024

Hearing

The court granted an adjournment requested by both parties and rescheduled the hearing for November 28, 2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.

6
Stage 516/09/2024

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 621/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted non-compliance with a previous order dated 06.08.2024 and directed the appellant to comply within seven days, scheduling the next hearing for 16.09.2024.

8
Stage 706/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to upload documents distinguishing between two different projects and scheduled the appeal for further orders/hearing on 21.08.2024.

9
Stage 810/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his unavailability and rescheduled the hearing for August 6, 2024.

10
Stage 913/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 10.07.2024 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.

11
Stage 1010/04/2024

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1106/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted a procedural defect regarding the appellant's reply to objections and directed the appellant to contact the Registry to rectify it; the matter is adjourned to 10.04.2024.

13
Stage 1231/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and scheduled the next hearing for March 6, 2024.

14
Stage 1304/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for January 31, 2024.

15
Stage 1427/09/2023

Hearing

No text available.

16
Stage 1514/08/2023

Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 1631/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of counsel for both parties and adjourned the appeal to 14.08.2023 for orders or hearing.

18
Stage 1720/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the hearing for May 31, 2023.

19
Stage 1813/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 20.04.2023 as the learned counsels for both parties are on sanctioned leave.

20
Stage 1902/02/2023

Hearing

No text available.

21
Stage 2021/12/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for February 2, 2023.

22
Stage 2106/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and directed the counsels to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon cases within 15 days, subsequently reserving the judgment.

23
Stage 2210/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange lists of dates and relied cases at least seven days before the next hearing and scheduled the matter for 20.04.2022, noting that failure to appear would result in the closure of arguments.

24
Stage 2307/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 28.01.2022.

25
Stage 2429/11/2021

Final Hearing

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

26
Stage 2516/11/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the final hearing for November 29, 2021.

27
Stage 2625/10/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to re-send the appeal memo via email and established a timeline for the respondent to file objections and the appellant to file a reply before the next hearing.

28
Stage 2717/09/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed both parties to exchange objections and replies via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 25.10.2021.

29
Stage 2823/04/2021

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

30
Stage 2926/03/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via email and follow specific timelines for filing objections and replies before the next hearing on 23.04.2021.

31
Stage 30Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126021542021-20-01-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant because the real estate project was not registered with RERA, making the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

32
Stage 31Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126021542021-29-11-2021

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant because the real estate project was not registered with RERA, making the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant because the real estate project was not registered with RERA, making the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Rajesh Chadha

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126021542021-20-01-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the appellant because the real estate project was not registered with RERA, making the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126021542021-29-11-2021

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for parsvnath developers limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →