Appellant / Complainant
Manoj Sharma
Respondent
Radhey Krishna Techno Build Pvt Ltd
radhey krishna techno build pvt ltd
₹11,97,009
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126023362022 by Manoj Sharma against Radhey Krishna Techno Build Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by allowing a settlement where the appellant shall deposit Rs. 11,00,000/- to the respondent, upon which the respondent must handover possession and execute the conveyance deed within specified timelines.
Hearing
The Tribunal found prima facie evidence of harassment by the promoter regarding illegal interest charges and directed the respondent to hand over possession of the unit on or before the next listing date.
Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for further hearing on 07.01.2025 and directed that no further adjournments will be granted, noting the matter will proceed based on available records if parties fail to appear.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered the matter to proceed ex parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear and directed the respondent to pay costs of Rs. 15,000/- to the appellant by the next hearing date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the next hearing for 22.11.2024, while directing the respondent to file any objections in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file a reply to the appellants' objections regarding a calculation chart and scheduled the next hearing for October 17, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to upload a calculation chart of outstanding dues and ordered the appellant to file objections to said chart within seven days, with the matter listed for hearing on 16.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to address the court regarding compliance with previous orders from the Regulatory Authority and the Tribunal, adjourning the matter to 23.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 06.05.2024 before the next hearing date.
Hearing
The Tribunal recorded the respondent's objections to the appellant's amendment application and adjourned the matter to 14.05.2024 for further orders/hearing after the respondent requested time to seek instructions regarding outstanding amounts.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's attempt to file written submissions without permission and granted the respondent one week to file objections to a pending amendment application.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds, rescheduling the hearing for April 4, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both counsels due to illness and sanctioned leave, subsequently scheduling the appeal for hearing on 04.03.2024.
For Order
This text represents the header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-258/2022) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Manoj Sharma and Radhey Krishna Techno Build Pvt Ltd, but contains no substantive rulings or directives.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a prior engagement at the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for 15.09.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 18.08.2023 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a copy of the execution application previously submitted to the Regulatory Authority and scheduled the matter for orders on 10.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon the joint request of counsel, scheduled the appeal for hearing on 07.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel and directed both parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments before the next hearing on 05.12.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 09.11.2022 for hearing after noting that the respondent's counsel had received the replication/rejoinder.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the case for hearing on 10.10.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the 221-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court relaxations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 04.08.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the applicant to serve the appeal and application for condonation of delay via speed-post and email, scheduling the matter for hearing on 07.07.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126023362022-27-01-2025
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by allowing a settlement where the appellant shall deposit Rs. 11,00,000/- to the respondent, upon which the respondent must handover possession and execute the conveyance deed within specified timelines.
Tribunal Order #0901126023362022-22-11-2024
The Tribunal ordered the matter to proceed ex parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear and directed the respondent to pay costs of Rs. 15,000/- to the appellant by the next hearing date.
Tribunal Order #0901126023362022-14-05-2024
The Tribunal directed the respondent to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 06.05.2024 before the next hearing date.
Tribunal Order #0901126023362022-07-01-2025
The Tribunal found prima facie evidence of harassment by the promoter regarding illegal interest charges and directed the respondent to hand over possession of the unit on or before the next listing date.
Tribunal Order #0901126023362022-04-08-2022
The Tribunal condoned the 221-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court relaxations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by allowing a settlement where the appellant shall deposit Rs. 11,00,000/- to the respondent, upon which the respondent must handover possession and execute the conveyance deed within specified timelines. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by allowing a settlement where the appellant shall deposit Rs. 11,00,000/- to the respondent, upon which the respondent must handover possession and execute the conveyance deed within specified timelines.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
upto 31.12.2024
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
- Harit Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by allowing a settlement where the appellant shall deposit Rs. 11,00,000/- to the respondent, upon which the respondent must handover possession and execute the conveyance deed within specified timelines.
The Tribunal ordered the matter to proceed ex parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear and directed the respondent to pay costs of Rs. 15,000/- to the appellant by the next hearing date.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 06.05.2024 before the next hearing date.
The Tribunal found prima facie evidence of harassment by the promoter regarding illegal interest charges and directed the respondent to hand over possession of the unit on or before the next listing date.
The Tribunal condoned the 221-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court relaxations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for radhey krishna techno build pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.