Appellant / Complainant
Abhimanue Kumar Tripathi
Respondent
Paarth Infrabuild Pvt Ltd
paarth infrabuild pvt ltd
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029402021 by Abhimanue Kumar Tripathi against Paarth Infrabuild Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing interim access to an existing club facility until the project's club is completed.
Hearing
The parties informed the Tribunal that a settlement has been reached, but requested a short adjournment to complete final formalities regarding unit fitment.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date, noting that failure to do so will result in adverse inferences.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 31, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and directed that the respondent's representative or an authorized person must appear in person on the next date of hearing.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection against the appellant's limitation application within one week and scheduled the matter for disposal of said application on 29.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for September 29, 2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange documents via email and file objections/replies before the next hearing on 07.09.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126029402021-16-05-2022
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing interim access to an existing club facility until the project's club is completed.
Tribunal Order #0901126029402021-29-11-2021
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126029402021-29-09-2021
The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126029402021-31-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date, noting that failure to do so will result in adverse inferences.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing interim access to an existing club facility until the project's club is completed. Awarded in favor of Partial.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing interim access to an existing club facility until the project's club is completed.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shailender Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajiv Shukla
- Suyash Bajpai
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing interim access to an existing club facility until the project's club is completed.
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date, noting that failure to do so will result in adverse inferences.
Need to research all rulings for paarth infrabuild pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.