Appellant / Complainant
Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Private Limited
Respondent
Santosh Bhat
suncity hi-tech infrastructures private limited
₹6,24,750
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126047642022 by Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Private Limited against Santosh Bhat before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the lower authority's order, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under the Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Hearing
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. 588/2022 for the relevant directions.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 02.12.2024 upon the joint request of counsel and directed that any rejoinder or objection be filed before the next hearing date.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's filing of a better affidavit and directed the respondent to file a reply within seven days, scheduling the next hearing for 25.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a better affidavit regarding the memo of appeal and objections, with the respondent permitted to file a response within one week thereafter; the matter is listed for further hearing on 18.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 15.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 15.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to family illness and rescheduled the hearing for 11.03.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a recall application filed by the appellant due to counsel's ill health, thereby setting aside the previous order dated 15.09.2023 that had imposed a cost of Rs 5,000/-.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final three-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs 5,000 due to previous delays.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for July 27, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondents' objections and scheduled the next hearing for April 6, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for January 25, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections to the appeal and directed the appellant to reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for November 29, 2022.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the issuance of fresh dasti summons to the respondent after previous service attempts were returned as 'unclaimed' and scheduled the next hearing for 31.10.2022.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined procedural requirements for service of appeal documents and the exchange of objections/replies before the next hearing on 22.09.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126047642022-11-12-2024
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the lower authority's order, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under the Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126047642022-21-09-2023
The Tribunal granted a recall application filed by the appellant due to counsel's ill health, thereby setting aside the previous order dated 15.09.2023 that had imposed a cost of Rs 5,000/-.
Tribunal Order #0901126047642022-15-09-2023
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final three-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs 5,000 due to previous delays.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the lower authority's order, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under the Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the lower authority's order, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under the Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Himanshu Bora
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sachin Gupta
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the lower authority's order, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under the Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
The Tribunal granted a recall application filed by the appellant due to counsel's ill health, thereby setting aside the previous order dated 15.09.2023 that had imposed a cost of Rs 5,000/-.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final three-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs 5,000 due to previous delays.
Need to research all rulings for suncity hi-tech infrastructures private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.