Appellant / Complainant
Shravan Kumar
Respondent
Dhanya Promoters Private Limited (Mahagun Group)
dhanya promoters private limited
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126058612021 by Shravan Kumar against Dhanya Promoters Private Limited (Mahagun Group) before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order disposing of execution proceedings, finding that the respondent misled the authority regarding completion certificates, and remanded the matter back to the Regulatory Authority to revive and decide the execution proceedings in accordance with law.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the next hearing for April 7, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and the appeal is ready for hearing; consequently, the matter is scheduled for a hearing on 24.01.2023.
Hearing
The appellant's counsel requested additional time to prepare the brief, resulting in the matter being adjourned to 16.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and rescheduled the hearing for 15.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 23, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular one.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal ruled that service on the respondent was sufficient via post and email/auto-generated links, granting the respondent 10 days to file objections or face ex-parte proceedings.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide postal track records and email transaction reports to prove service on the respondent, while setting a timeline for filing objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to take necessary steps to serve notice to the respondent within 10 days and scheduled the case for 09.02.2022 to address the application for limitation.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed late, ordered notice to be issued to the respondents via registered post and email, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 11.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126058612021-05-07-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular one.
Tribunal Order #0901126058612021-19-05-2023
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order disposing of execution proceedings, finding that the respondent misled the authority regarding completion certificates, and remanded the matter back to the Regulatory Authority to revive and decide the execution proceedings in accordance with law.
Tribunal Order #0901126058612021-12-05-2022
The Tribunal ruled that service on the respondent was sufficient via post and email/auto-generated links, granting the respondent 10 days to file objections or face ex-parte proceedings.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order disposing of execution proceedings, finding that the respondent misled the authority regarding completion certificates, and remanded the matter back to the Regulatory Authority to revive and decide the execution proceedings in accordance with law. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order disposing of execution proceedings, finding that the respondent misled the authority regarding completion certificates, and remanded the matter back to the Regulatory Authority to revive and decide the execution proceedings in accordance with law.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nirmit Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular one.
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order disposing of execution proceedings, finding that the respondent misled the authority regarding completion certificates, and remanded the matter back to the Regulatory Authority to revive and decide the execution proceedings in accordance with law.
The Tribunal ruled that service on the respondent was sufficient via post and email/auto-generated links, granting the respondent 10 days to file objections or face ex-parte proceedings.
Need to research all rulings for dhanya promoters private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.