Appellant / Complainant
Mohd. Ahamd
Respondent
Rsons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd.
rsons infraland developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001752020 by Mohd. Ahamd against Rsons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Ex-Parte
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the matter and no request for adjournment was received.
Ex-Parte
This text represents the header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-164/2020) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Mohd. Ahmad and M/S RSONS Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd., but contains no substantive ruling or directive.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal noted the non-appearance of both parties for the last two hearings and directed them to appear on 02.12.2022, noting that the matter will be heard ex-parte if they fail to attend.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of both counsels and scheduled the matter for further orders on 07.11.2022.
Further Order
The case was adjourned due to the non-appearance of both parties and is rescheduled for hearing on 12.10.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022 due to the respondent's absence.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 04.08.2022 and directed that if the respondent fails to file a reply or appear, the case may proceed ex-parte.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the issuance of a fresh notice to the respondent to ensure they are heard on merit and instructed the appellant to serve the appeal documents via speed post and email.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in seven consolidated appeals, directing that the defective appeals be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a limitation application and subsequently reserved its judgment on that specific point.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the presence of the applicant's counsel and the absence of the respondent, subsequently adjourning the matter to 04.01.2022 for the disposal of the limitation application.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal treated the service of notice via newspaper publication as sufficient and granted the applicant one week to file a better affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay.
Ex-Parte
Upon the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the case for a hearing on 09.11.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to serve notice to the respondent via publication in two local newspapers (one in Hindi) because previous attempts at service failed, and ordered the consolidated listing of seven related appeals.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an application for newspaper publication of notice because summons could not be served at the respondent's closed office; the case is listed for 26.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001752020-05-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in seven consolidated appeals, directing that the defective appeals be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund.
Tribunal Order #0901126001752020-04-08-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022 due to the respondent's absence.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shishir Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Counsel for Appellant SHISHIR SRIVASTAVA | |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in seven consolidated appeals, directing that the defective appeals be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022 due to the respondent's absence.
Need to research all rulings for rsons infraland developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.