Appellant / Complainant
Firdaus Nawazish Khanam
Respondent
Rsons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd.
rsons infraland developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001792020 by Firdaus Nawazish Khanam against Rsons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Ex-Parte
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the matter.
Ex-Parte
Due to the non-appearance of any parties at the hearing, the Tribunal adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for further orders on 03.01.2023.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal noted the non-appearance of both parties for the last two hearings and directed them to appear on 02.12.2022 for an ex-parte hearing.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of both counsels and directed them to appear on the next scheduled date of 07.11.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of both parties and scheduled it for a hearing on 12.10.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed that the case proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 04.08.2022 and directed that if the respondent fails to file a reply or appear at the next hearing, the case may proceed ex-parte.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to the respondent to ensure they are heard on merit and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and email.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in seven consolidated appeals, directing that the defective appeals be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application on the point of limitation and reserved judgment on that specific issue.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that while the applicant served notice, the respondent failed to appear; consequently, the case is listed for 04.01.2022 to address the limitation application and any objections.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via newspaper publication is sufficient and allowed the applicant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the case for hearing on 09.11.2021.
For Order
The case was adjourned to 18.03.2021 due to a lawyer strike by the Oudh Bar Association, with a directive for the appellant to comply with a previous order dated 04.02.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for newspaper publication of notice due to unsuccessful service of summons on the respondent and adjourned the matter to 26.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001792020-09-11-2021
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via newspaper publication is sufficient and allowed the applicant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126001792020-04-08-2022
The Tribunal directed that the case proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126001792020-05-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in seven consolidated appeals, directing that the defective appeals be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed for want of prosecution Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed for want of prosecution
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shishir Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via newspaper publication is sufficient and allowed the applicant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay.
The Tribunal directed that the case proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022.
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in seven consolidated appeals, directing that the defective appeals be registered as regular appeals subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund.
Need to research all rulings for rsons infraland developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.